GOP's sales taxes hit modest incomes

Published October 12, 2015

Editorial by Wilmington Star-News, October 10, 2015.

This year's General Assembly, like most sessions, was a mixed bag -- some good stuff, some bad.

One disturbing trend, however, is emerging: A conviction among many of our legislators that the way to pay for state government is by nickel- and dime-ing those least able to pay.

The Honorables cut the state's personal income tax rate. For those making $30,000 or less, that will mean $50 less on their tax bills.

To counterbalance that, the Honorables turned around and expanded the sales tax to cover all sorts of previously untaxed services.

They did the same thing last year, adding a sales tax to movie and theater tickets, manufactured housing (read: double-wide mobile homes) and college students' cafeteria meal tickets.

This time, they had the bright idea of taxing car and appliance repairs and veterinary services. Did your pickup break down? This'll add 6.75 percent to your bill. Is your washing machine on the fritz? Fluffy needs a rabies shot? Ka-ching, ka-ching.

A quick check of federal statistics found that most workers earning $30,000 to $40,000 pay about $630 a year for repair and maintenance services. New sales taxes, then, will just about wipe out their income tax cut. If they have a bad year -- say, the family car turns out to be a lemon, or the refrigerator breaks -- they could easily wind up paying more.

As we've pointed out before, most economists consider the sales tax to be regressive. That means it hits harder on poorer citizens, who tend to squander their money on food, rent and children's shoes, than it does on the wealthier ones, who save, invest and sometimes contribute to legislators' campaigns.

These new taxes, however, seem particularly obnoxious.

Admittedly, not all of them affect the poor -- for example, the sales tax now applies to pet-grooming charges. But some of them seem inspired by the old quote, attributed to the late hotel queen Leona Helmsley, that taxes are for little people.

As one commentator pointed out, better-off drivers tend to trade in their cars every two or three years. The less well off hold on to their transportation and pay to keep it fixed and patched.

The Republicans who passed these increases often talk about their devotion to the small businessman (or woman). Yet all these extra sales taxes will mean extra paperwork and expense for small garages, self-employed mechanics, small veterinary clinics and other non-corporate entrepreneurs.

To add insult to injury, the legislature added a mean little twist. All those sales tax extensions will take effect on March 1. The income tax cuts, however, won't go into effect until 2017 -- which means that most taxpayers won't see any benefit until they file their returns in 2018. For a year or so, then, everybody pays extra. Ka-ching, ka-ching.

Some people think this is great. State Rep. Bob Rucho, R-Mecklenburg, who wrote much of the tax plan, told reporters, "We’re trying to get rid of income tax and move to a consumption-based tax.”

In other words, more sales taxes.

When our local legislators come around next year and ask us to vote for them again, they should be asked, sharply, what they think of all this and what they're going to do about it.

Otherwise, they should be made to pay.

http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20151010/ARTICLES/151009684/1108/editorial?template=printart

October 12, 2015 at 7:17 pm
Norm Kelly says:

What's the opposite of a 'regressive' tax? What libs/socialists/editorial writers call a 'progressive' tax. How is a progressive tax defined? As you earn more money, as you become more financially successful, you don't just pay more taxes cuz your income went up. Nope, the progressive way to implement an income tax is to hurt you more as you make more. Your success means you are penalized more. In turn, a 'progressive' tax means that those who don't make enough aren't taxed at all. In many cases those who don't make enough to contribute to the cost of state government even ended up with an unearned income tax credit - what libs refer to as the earned income tax credit. Except the idea is that you didn't earn enough, therefore because of your unearned income, you get money given to you by taxpayers. In lib speak, this means taking money from 'the wealthy' to give to 'the poor'. Also known as buying demon votes!

How does a good lib define a regressive tax? One that makes everybody pay. Even those who don't earn 'enough' have a stake in the game. Which is as it should be.

When libs whine about the way Republicans are implementing taxes, the best, most logical response is to celebrate. When libs whine about it, it must mean the taxes are going in the right and proper direction. Eliminate income taxes completely. Amen! Then everyone who contributes by being productive can keep what they earn. Period. Which is the absolute most fair way to implement taxes. Problem with this for libs: they don't get to play games with peoples income taxes and play favorites by pitting one group ('the wealthy') against another group (the favored 'poor'). Libs don't get to whine about 'their fair share'. Which they refuse to define, by the way. So, since it prevents lib pols from playing games, and using it as a stick during campaign season, it's natural that libs don't like the idea. Which is why we know it's good for the state and right for the people.

I agree with the conclusion of the editorial though. Reward those pols who have started reducing income taxes and replacing it with sales taxes. Those who buy, which is more 'the wealthy' than 'the poor', should pay more. And we all know 'the hated wealthy' buy more stuff than the beloved 'poor'. It's hard to spend $50,000 each year when you make only about $30,000. But it's easy to spend $10,000 (or more) when you make $100,000 or more. So doesn't the 'wealthy' person end up paying more in sales taxes than the beloved 'poor'? Yes. But still, it prevents lib pols from playing games with peoples incomes and buying low-information votes.

Which is a higher tax: on a new car or a car repair?