Let's wait on the bipartisan backslapping in NC legislature

Published May 24, 2016

by Patrick Gannon, The Insider, published in Salisbury Post, May 24, 2016.

I’ll admit I almost got goose bumps when applause broke out after the recent House budget vote.

The 103-12 tally on the House’s 2016-17 spending plan represented a strong, bipartisan showing for the budget crafted by the Republican majority. Thirty Democrats joined every House Republican voting for the $22.2 billion budget. A dozen Democrats voted against it.

This year’s House budget vote was the most lopsided since Republicans took control of both General Assembly chambers in 2011.

It was no surprise that House Speaker Tim Moore, a Kings Mountain Republican, played up the Democratic votes. In a news release, the speaker’s office touted “extraordinary bipartisan support” and a “landmark House budget vote.”

Awwwww. What a happy family we have in the House!

Not so fast. It’s not that simple.

The House budget has plenty to like for members of both sides of the aisle. It provides average 4.1 percent raises for teachers, 2 percent salary increases and $500 bonuses for rank-and-file state employees and 1.6 percent cost-of-living adjustments for government retirees.

It also has no new fee increases – plenty of those came last year. And it cuts taxes mainly for middle- and lower-income taxpayers in the form of higher standard deductions, phased in over four years.

But Democrats who argued against the budget said the tax cuts enacted by Republicans in recent years haven’t done enough to help lower-income residents and have left the state with fewer dollars that could be giving larger raises to state employees and teachers and funding important programs like drug treatment courts in a growing state.

By giving “excessive tax cuts” to millionaires and corporations, “we just eliminate a lot that we could be doing,” said Rep. Paul Luebke, a liberal Durham Democrat, during budget debate.

The true test of bipartisanship in the House this year will come after the House and Senate negotiate the final plan.

Rep. Darren Jackson, a Wake County Democrat, said he hoped House Republicans wouldn’t “go out in public and make a big deal about how bipartisan the vote is.” Jackson said he and other Democrats voted for budget to show strength in numbers to the Senate. They hope that House negotiators will “hold tough” for state employees and teachers when working on a compromise with senators.

“In my eight years here, I have never seen a budget leave here and get better in that chamber,” he said.

Rep. Larry Hall, a Durham Democrat and the House minority leader, said Democrats have tried various tactics – from support to dissent – when voting on House budgets the past few years.

Each time, he contended, Senate negotiators “rolled” House counterparts, getting more of what they wanted in the final spending plans.

Hall said he voted against this budget to challenge the House Republicans to “do better and to stand up to the Senate and ensure we have the proper investments in our future.”

The Senate is now drafting its own budget before negotiators from both chambers meet to iron out differences and come up with a compromise plan. If 30 House Democrats again vote for that plan, then Moore, the House speaker, truly will have something to boast about.

Patrick Gannon is editor of The Insider State Government News Service in Raleigh. Reach him at pgannon@ncinsider.com.

- See more at: http://www.salisburypost.com/2016/05/24/gannon-lets-wait-on-the-bipartisan-backslapping-in-nc-legislature/#sthash.B0VkKDsx.dpuf

May 24, 2016 at 10:14 am
Norm Kelly says:

'If 30 House Democrats again vote for that plan'.

But until then, Republicans better NOT claim anything was bipartisan. Demoncrats DID NOT go along with Republicans on this because they thought it was a good budget. There is NOTHING that can be labeled 'bipartisanship' when it's demons who try to get along with Republicans. Bipartisanship, as defined by libs, means Republicans giving up everything to go along with the schemes and bogus plans of left-wing zealots. It's only bipartisanship when Republicans cave. When demons try to get along, it was only to send a message. Or to show some other group that demons really, actually, truly do stand for something.

And, let's not forget that demons are still railing against Republicans providing tax cuts to people who actually pay taxes. That dreaded, hated, spoiled group that left-wing radicals (pols and media allies) refer to as 'the wealthy'. Demons NEVER NEVER EVER believe 'the wealthy' should be allowed to keep what they earn. If it weren't for the little people getting screwed 'the wealthy' simply would not exist. Then what would demons do? How would demons win races if they couldn't pit 'the wealthy' against 'the poor'? And how would demons continue to buy so many votes if they didn't have 'the wealthy' to steal money from?

(next time you hear ANY lib make the claim that 'the wealthy' don't pay their fair share, ask them what their fair share is. bet they can't and won't answer the question. it also kinda discourages 'the poor' from wanting to try to become 'the wealthy', which somehow works in favor of demons.)