Lofty, laudable education goals

Published January 30, 2016

by Patrick Gannon, The Insider, published by The Greenville Daily Reflector, January 29, 2016.

Even as an often-cynical reporter, I was impressed by the collaboration among some of the state’s top education and business leaders at a recent meeting of Gov. Pat McCrory’s Education Cabinet.

The panel includes representatives from K-12 public schools, the community college and university systems, the business community, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina and NC Works, a partnership that aims to connect workers with jobs.

It’s not that often that this many smart people sit around the same table, and all play a huge role in educating children and preparing the work force.

A top initiative of the cabinet is to meet the goal of 67 percent of the working population being educated or trained beyond high school by 2025 to help fill the skills gap for businesses that need qualified workers.

McCrory’s senior education advisor, Catherine Truitt, said 54 percent of the state’s workers currently have some sort of post-high school education. By 2025, less than a decade from now, the state will need an additional 520,000 trained workers to meet employers’ demands.

“That, if we had to fill today, we would not have the human capacity to do,” Truitt said. “So this is our gap.”

Truitt said we’re approaching an “economic reality” where a lack of training or education beyond high school often means you will sit below the poverty line. That education doesn’t just include college degrees, but also certifications in fields such as auto mechanics, welding and truck driving.

So 67 percent is a crucial goal.

There are roadblocks to every objective. Education Cabinet members went around the room listing them.

As always, there’s a waiting list for pre-kindergarten slots for at-risk children, as the importance of early childhood education has never been more obvious.

Many schools with large concentrations of low-income students continue to struggle, even though there are success stories. Bill Cobey, chairman of the State Board of Education, said a continuing focus on digital learning, along with coaching for young teachers, would help meet that challenge.

“We’ve got to bring those kids along, for everybody’s sake,” Cobey said.

State Schools Superintendent June Atkinson said schools need to hire more career development counselors to give sound advice to students.

“That is a big strategy for helping students to develop dreams,” she said.

Teachers need more career development opportunities, particularly in digital learning, and better and faster Internet access still is needed in parts of the state.

Salaries for teachers should be increased to encourage the brightest students to enter that profession.

“We’re going to be very focused on that in the coming short session,” said Rep. Craig Horn, a Union County Republican.

McCrory suggested a need to ensure county and state inmates leave prisons with opportunities other than returning to crime.

“That could help us get a qualified work force and give people a second chance,” McCrory said.

The governor also said he would continue to fight for better mental health and addiction recovery programs.

“We’re losing not only families and individuals, but we’re losing potential talent for the future,” McCrory said.

A representative from the university system stressed the importance of keeping education costs low, so students aren’t saddled with insurmountable debt after graduation.

Truitt, the education advisor, summed up the 67 percent initiative.

“In meeting this goal, we are better preparing our population for future jobs, we’re better positioned for economic growth and we want to help people reach a better quality of life,” she said.

McCrory said at the start of the Education Cabinet meeting that the panel has been a “very engaging group of people who have been very upfront with each other.”

That must continue.

Patrick Gannon writes about North Carolina Government and politics for the Capitol Press Association.

http://www.reflector.com/opinion/other-voices/gannon-lofty-laudable-education-goals-3124451

January 30, 2016 at 11:21 am
Norm Kelly says:

'A representative from the university system stressed the importance of keeping education costs low'.

Yup. And who is in charge of making this happen? Can this be accomplished by having politicians MAKE education FREE? What constitutes FREE education? Is it that the STUDENT attending school and getting a degree doesn't have to pay? If that's what pols mean by FREE then the answer is NO this is NOT FREE! But it is exactly what libs mean by 'free'; the recipient of this government largesse does not pay for it; like every other lib give-away scheme that increases actual cost!

Does it mean that teachers need to teach classes in order to get paid? Well, yes, teachers need to teach in order to get paid otherwise they ARE NOT teachers. If they don't teach, why are they there? If they don't teach, they shouldn't be getting paid from the teaching budget!

Does it mean that administrators need to get paid a more reasonable salary? Yes. Does it mean there needs to be a more realistic number of administrators? Yes. Who exactly is in charge of making this happen? Administrators! Who fights this happening at every opportunity? Administrators. And libs. Top-heavy or 'over paid' private sector administrators are constantly berated by libs. But whenever anyone points out that public-sector administrators are either over-paid or too many exist, it's libs that come out to defend. When taxpayers are footing the bill, libs seem to believe that their is no such thing as 'too many' or 'over paid'. Why? What purpose do all these over-paid administrators serve? Why are they so powerfully defended by lib pols?

The more government gets between the student and the tuition, the less likely anyone is to pay attention to what the cost actually is. It happens EVERY TIME government gets involved in the regulation, payment, oversight, control of any business. And libs overwhelmingly control education. So, if not libs, then who is to blame for the state of education in our nation? Not just primary education, but the entire education establishment. Big business is berated by libs constantly, repeatedly, every chance they get; and they make up chances to berate private 'big' business. Remember 'big oil'? Then there was 'big fast food'? 'Big tobacco'. When was the last time ANY lib ever referred to 'big education'? Never. Why? What's the diff between a 'big' private business and a 'big' public sector business? The private sector responds to customers; or fails. What does public sector business respond to? Does anyone still think that big public sector businesses respond to customers? Think DMV for a second. Then consider the VA Health care monopoly. Oh, and don't forget, the most recent Flint water situation. Then there's the NC coal ash spill. (the reason i mention coal ash is because government officials who were responsible for preventing this disaster KNEW it was happening and ignored it for decades. who ruled raleigh while the coal ash disaster was happening? demons! who was SUPPOSED to protect citizens from this disaster happening. demon-appointed public-sector employees. who exactly did NOT do their jobs? that's right, demon-appointed public-sector employees!) Anyone who still thinks that public-sector business is GOOD for anyone is either a delusional lib, burying their head(s) in the sand, doesn't pay attention to the news, or in the case of lib pols all of the above. I know, saying 'delusional' and 'lib' in the same sentence is redundant, but sometimes it's important to repeat in order to make a point.

I'm now going back to praying for lib pols to finally see the light and the error of their ways. I've given up praying for lib 'news' people or those libs who have an editorial platform; too hopeless. I'll leave praying for that group to others.