NC rising health insurance rates demand smart strategies

Published November 24, 2014

by Ann Doss Helms, Charlotte Observer, November 21, 2014.

People renewing health insurance bought on the Affordable Care Act exchange are seeing higher rate increases in Charlotte and North Carolina than most places across the country, a flurry of national analyses show.

For instance, a  Kaiser Family Foundation look at the largest city in each state found that only Anchorage, Alaska, had higher rates and bigger increases than Charlotte. North Carolina’s results vary with studies using different methods, but the state consistently comes out high.

Enrollment for 2015 began Nov. 15 and runs through Feb. 15. As national policy analysts began crunching numbers, local customers got a look at their new rates.

Julie and Mike Tuggle, self-employed real estate brokers in Charlotte, bought a subsidized Blue Cross and Blue Shield policy in 2014 and paid $376 a month. Their notice said the total premium was going up 16 percent, but their share would go to $622, a 65 percent increase.

“I expected it to be the same, or like 10 percent different,” Julie Tuggle said.

Such increases don’t necessarily mean customers will pay more. They do mean it’s important to look at this year’s offerings, rather than letting a policy automatically renew. UnitedHealthcare has joined Blue Cross and Coventry in offering subsidized health insurance in North Carolina, and the two that were in the 2014 market have revised some plans.

Because federal subsidies are pegged to premiums, North Carolina’s big bump could actually cut costs for some people who get aid. More than 357,000 residents bought policies during last year’s enrollment, and 91 percent got subsidies.

“Everybody should absolutely shop around,” said Adam Linker, a health policy analyst for the  N.C. Justice Center.

That’s what the Tuggles did. They chose a UnitedHealthcare policy that will cost them $353 a month, with slightly higher out-of-pocket costs.

Linker and Cynthia Cox, an author of the  Kaiser Foundation analysis, say tepid competition and the absence of public rate review likely contribute to North Carolina’s high rates. While some states disclose proposed rate increases and take public comments, North Carolina does not. And only Blue Cross offers policies on the ACA exchange in all 100 North Carolina counties.

“We’re getting the introduction of some of that competition,” Linker said, “but it’s still too early for that to translate into better rates.”

Changes are complex

Calculating a year-to-year rate change might seem like basic math, but it’s not.

Each company offers an array of plans. The ACA labels policies on the exchange as bronze, silver or gold, with bronze offering the lowest premiums and benefits. Higher levels cost more but come with lower out-of-pocket costs, access to more doctors and other advantages.

Premiums vary by age, smoking status and place of residence. Crossing a county line can make a difference, based on the health of people who sign up and the rates each insurer can negotiate with hospitals and physicians.

One approach to comparing rates is to average all the plans in the 2015 database and compare them with the 2014 average. The PricewaterhouseCoopers Health Research Institute  did that and found that North Carolina’s average rate increase is 11.8 percent, compared with a national average of 5.2 percent. The average 2015 rate in North Carolina is tallied at $384 a month, $2 below the national average.

But critics say that’s like calculating an average car price without taking into account that people buy more Hondas than Lamborghinis. Most of the priciest plans on the exchange get few takers, experts say, with buyers overwhelmingly favoring the cheapest silver and bronze plans.

Silver standard

Tax credits, or subsidies, are based on the buyer’s household income and the premium for the second-cheapest silver plan in the market. That’s what some experts look at for 2015 trends.

Avalere Health, a Washington-based consulting company,  compared rates for the “benchmark” silver plans – the second-cheapest in each market – in 34 states that use the federal exchange.

North Carolina’s 2015 average for a 50-year-old nonsmoker choosing that plan is $456, a 9 percent increase, Avalere reports. For all 34 states, the average was $395, a 3 percent increase.

Kaiser, a Washington-based foundation focused on health issues,  tallied changes in the premium for the benchmark silver plan in the biggest city of each state. Anchorage, where the rate rose 28 percent to $488 a month, was by far the most expensive.

Charlotte’s rate rose 7 percent, to $328 a month. In addition to Anchorage, five cities (New York; Indianapolis; Milwaukee; Burlington, Vt.; and Cheyenne, Wyo.) had rates higher than Charlotte’s but saw smaller year-to-year increases. Another half-dozen cities with lower rates saw bigger percentage increases than Charlotte, but only Anchorage topped Charlotte on both counts.

Additional data Kaiser provided to the Observer show that Wake County’s benchmark plan rose 13 percent, to $305 a month. Residents of Gaston and Lincoln counties will pay a little less than their counterparts in Mecklenburg, while those in nearby Rowan County will pay more.

It’s important to note that the benchmark plan in 2014 isn’t necessarily the benchmark for 2015, so people who simply let their policy renew automatically may end up paying more.

The  New York Times did a similar analysis to Kaiser’s, but it looked at changes in the cheapest silver plan in each market. In most cases, the Times found, people who have those plans will save money if they switch to the new cheapest plan.

In the Charlotte area, for instance, customers who renew will pay $328 a month, a 9.1 percent increase, while those who switch to the new lowest-cost silver plan will pay $324, or 7.6 percent more.

“Of course, switching plans has its costs – in many cases, it means changing doctors and drug lists. It also may mean mastering new deductibles, co-payments and other benefit structures,” the Times reports. “The tough choice before consumers – between a price hike and the inconveniences of switching – is a consequence of the Affordable Care Act’s reliance on competition to control health insurance prices.”

It’s not always a choice. Deanna May of Charlotte says she has a subsidized Coventry silver plan that costs her $58 a month. Her renewal notice says that plan is being dropped. If she does nothing, she’ll be enrolled in a different Coventry silver plan that will cost her $102.39.

May says she’s shopping, and she’s frustrated by the complexity of figuring out which specialists are in the network for plans.

“It does not matter what insurance you use, Healthcare Marketplace or other, problems of this nature are rampant and systemic,” May said. “The system needs to be simplified and expanded.”

Vivian Wilson of Charlotte, an early childhood teacher, said she doesn’t plan to switch, even though her payment for the Coventry plan she bought in October will go from $43 to $76 a month. She qualified for a belated 2014 enrollment when she left a job where insurance cost her more than $300 a month for one that doesn’t offer coverage.

“I was surprised at how much the cost went up” for 2015, Wilson said, but “it’s still a great rate for me.”

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/11/21/v-print/5333117/north-carolinas-rising-health.html

November 24, 2014 at 9:25 am
Norm Kelly says:

Some states are charging a fee on top of what the insurance policy cost. How many of those extra fees are calculated into the survey results discussed in this post? Of course, most of the states that charge a premium on top of the actual cost of the insurance are those states that got suckered into participating in socialized medicine and created their own 'marketplace'.

It's interesting to note that Obamacancer expects 'competition' to help reduce costs of health insurance. Two problems I see with that. First, if 91% of NC 'enrollees' received subsidies, where does that money come from? Someone somewhere has to pay for that 91%; this money does not come out of thin air regardless of how many times socialists tell you that it comes from the federal budget. Second, the feds expect competition yet some states, if not many states, have experienced where only 1 insurance company has decided to participate in 'the marketplace'. Like in NC where only Blue Cross has decided to participate across the entire state. Seems this has reduced competition for health insurance dollars. Instead of socialized medicine INCREASING choice for NC residents, federal interference in the market has reduced choice for MOST NC residents. And when illegals are added to the insurance rolls thanks to the occupiers most recent venture into illegal activity, the costs will skyrocket due to even more people being subsidized. Add to the lack of competition and choice the fact that I can't pick & choose what coverage I pay for anymore. I am FORCED by central planner decree to pay for things like maternity benefits. There are other items that the central planners force me to pay for, but this is one of the most egregious. And it's becoming more obvious that the name of the scheme is 'marketplace' so that low-information types (typically demon voters!) BELIEVE the lie about this being a free-market driven solution to the challenges that have existed in the health insurance market for decades. It's the first step, as admitted by demon pols in Washington, toward what K referred to as 'single payer health care'. Single payer is lib code for a full government takeover of the entire health care market. And if our choices are limited/controlled/restricted by the central planners now, if the death panels scare you, just wait until phase 2 kicks in. God forbid Billary is elected next cycle, phase 2 will be implemented with all haste. And she will use executive action if necessary, as the current occupier has demonstrated that absolutely NOTHING is off limits for such illegal activity.

Can we expect truth about socialized medicine from libs and/or this administration? No. Expecting truth from this administration on ANY TOPIC is foolish. Can we expect truth from the allies of this administration in the media. It would appear NOT. It seems the media types are rallying the wagons around this administration because, for some reason, media types like big government, support socialism more than free-enterprise, and want to spread misery to more people instead of more opportunity to more people. What a shame! We have come to expect lies from pols, misinformation from libs/socialists, even though it's shameful. But what explains the 'news' media types being so obviously biased instead of being news agencies?

November 25, 2014 at 11:36 am
Richard Bunce says:

"Someone somewhere has to pay for that 91%; this money does not come out of thin air regardless of how many times socialists tell you that it comes from the federal budget."

The MMT advocates disagree... it can come from thin air.

November 24, 2014 at 11:15 am
Richard Bunce says:

If you can lower your taxable income as much as possible... but not below 100% of poverty... and sign up for a Silver plan in the ACA Marketplace to not only take advantage of the ACA Marketplace tax credit/subsidy but also the little reported on Cost Share Reduction program only available to this with income less than 250% of poverty (but again more than 100% of poverty) which could change the insurers share of typical costs from ~70% for a straight silver plan to more the 90% for a silver plan with CSR.