Putting the statue of decency and good government back on a pedestal

Published August 29, 2018

by Cash Michael, Black journalist and NC SPIN panelist, published on Facebook, August 29, 2018.

My conservative "NC Spin" colleague, columnist John Hood, is thoroughly ticked about Silent Sam, the Confederate statue that demonstrators effectively mugged on August 20th, being brought down by force and frustration.

He says in a civilized society, there are ways and avenues in which citizens should use to affect change, and in this piece, then quotes Dr. King about the essence of peaceful civil disobedience.

Now, I'm a man of peace as well, and I agree that more times than not, I prefer the lawful, cool, calm and collected way of honestly solving problems.

But notice I inserted the word "honestly" in there. And there's the rub. Demonstrators believed, and there's evidence to back them up, that any official deliberations about eventually removing Silent Sam were really stall tactics on the part of "responsible"

officials who really had no intention of ever moving Sam anywhere, and were just in the business of placating critics until they wore themselves out.

The problem with being "civil" is that, more times than not when it comes to government, "civility" is used as a weapon to maintain the status quo. When you have an issue infused with such passion as Silent Sam, common sense tells you that's going to last but for so long.

But in addition, I, respectfully (CIVILITY ALERT, CIVILITY ALERT) take strong exception to John's extraordinary hypocrisy here.

Here in NC, we have Republican legislative leaders who behave like craven thieves -in-the-night, surpassed only by that criminal-prone disgrace of a human being currently sitting in the White House, who effectively have done EXACTLY the same thing those protesters did with Silent Sam to our democracy in our state - namely give not so much as a damn about how what they're doing looks, or who it hurts, as long as they achieve their ultimate goal of maximum power over all, and on behalf of their cronies.

Oh, but Republicans are doing it legally, you say? Not according to our courts, thank GOD, which is why Republican legislative leaders want to take control of the state's judiciary so bad.

Now I could be accused of comparing apples to oranges - comparing "mob rule" to the "lawful," albeit indelicate process of gaining and maintaining power, and I'll accept that. But honestly, I don't see the difference between tearing down a dastardly symbol of evil white supremacy, and so-called "lawmakers" tearing down a legislative process to the point where the interests, needs and wants of the average North Carolina citizen are herenever heard, or considered, or respected.

I could easily respect John Hood's take on the Silent Sam controversy, and his "demand" that it be returned to its dubious "pedestal', and the offending demonstrators be punished to the fullest extent of the law (and I expect they will), IF, I ALSO witnessed similar disgust from Sir Hood about the abhorrent pirate-like behavior of some of his "conservative friends."

Mind you, I "get" that the built-in resolution of my complaint here is called "ELECTIONS," and if the people hate the kind of government they're getting here in the Old North State, all they have to do is go to the polls when the appropriate time comes.

But these same scoundrels that John is so lenient on have invested mightily in rigging the process with unconstitutional voting districts (can you spell racial gerrymandering, boys and girls?) or equally unconstitutional restrictive voting laws.

Now, of course, John doesn't agree with my assessment of the GOP's redistricting and voter ID parlor tricks. Again, these are "friends" of John Hood's we're talking about here, so conservative appearances must be maintained.

I get that, John.

But in this week where the nation is about to bury a TRUE American hero who told it like it was, no matter what anybody else said, it is a real shame that we can't see more of that from the right-wing side of political life around here.

I've known John Hood for many years, and he's actually mellowed somewhat in his conservative rhetoric over time (folks who watch us on TV who stop me at the gym or supermarket don't think so).

But John, I'm all for the rule of law...just as long as I see equal outrage when the people we elect and pay are not allowed to RUIN the law!

I haven't seen that from you lately (or ever really), John Hood.

Help the rest of us put the statue of decency and good government back on its pedestal in North Carolina, John, for Lord knows the lawlessness we've continuously seen from your "friends" since 2011 is an embarrassment and disgrace to ALL of us.

And I'm, quite frankly, tired of the state and federal courts telling us so! -

August 29, 2018 at 2:44 pm
Richard L Bunce says:

Nonsense, destruction of the statute was a violation of law... Legislatures actions were in the law and NC Constitution... you may disagree with those actions but they were not unlawful.

The Federal courts ruling on gerrymandering, racial or otherwise, is at this point just another ruling one way or another. Until the USSC clears this all up there will continue to be gerrymandering. Rs pack and crack voters using Census race data (self identified social construct) and Ds spread and allocate racial voters using that same Census race data... both for political advantage. As a recent report noted, Census race data (self identified social construct) is a better indicator of candidate preference than party affiliation. Plenty of hypocrisy to go around.

Wait until 2020 when local government officials figure out they can tell their residents how to fill in the Census race question to increase their government units chances of getting Federal aid AND the political parties tell their party members how tofill in the Census race question to allow them to use the VRA, CRA, 14th Amendment to gerrymander districts for political advantage.

September 1, 2018 at 10:16 am
Norm Kelly says:

I agree with Mr. Bunce. Most of what's written in this editorial is simply garbage. Comparing lawlessness because it's a cause you believe in to the actions of the legislature is simply foolish.

That being said, it's important and interesting to note that if this editorial were written about 8-10 years ago, and you substituted the word "Democrat" for the word "Republican" it would read exactly the same. When D's were gerrymandering, which of these outraged alt-left libs whined? If not then, why now? Is it simply because they are out of power? Of course, which is also why these alt-left zealots are so interested in protecting illegal aliens and want more illegals to vote. They believe allowing illegals in and supporting illegals more than they support citizens will restore them to power. It's no longer a simple tax-and-spend policy for alt-left zealots, it's now become an issue of the future of our Republic. Alt-left politicians and their mind-numbed supporters have proven, and supported in this editorial, that lawlessness WILL be tolerated AND SUPPORTED so long as the perps are also alt-left zealots voting 'properly'.

Kill a dog, jail, financial penalty. Kill a baby, no problem. Break a law detested by alt-left zealots, no problem. Protest outside a baby-killing clinic, expect arrest, financial penalty.

Destroy public property, expect support from alt-left zealots like the author so long as it's a left-wing hated piece of property. Destroy anything beloved by alt-left socialists, expect extreme punishment. Tear down a memorial in Durham, have your case dismissed. Speak of your Christian religion in public, especially on ANY school grounds, expect serious repercussions, including financial penalty as well as potential expulsion from said school.

When law breakers are supported and encouraged, you know for a fact that the supporter has NO MORAL BEARING, and encourages mob rule. The author of this piece is such a person, and those like the author should never be trusted in the public sector. Simply typing this response could land me in jail for disagreeing with an alt-left socialist zealot, if the zealots get their way. Disagreement with the authoritarian rulers is prohibited. Just ask the Chinese or Koreans!

Some of us remember just a few short years ago when it was considered 'racist' simply to disagree with the then President, who is himself a racist. Anyone who disagreed with that socialist was labeled a racist and shut down immediately. Cuz left-wing zealots believe theirs is the ultimate opinion and CAN NOT, MUST NOT be questioned. Sounds an awful lot like China and Korea. Wonder how many left-wing zealot supporters understand this factual comparison? Recent poll shows a majority of Americans support socialism. Alt-left zealots ARE having an impact. (wonder how many of those polled were 'intelligent' Americans vs. how many were alt-left voters)