Richardson education reform plan is on target

Published April 28, 2017

Editorial by Fayetteville Observer, April 26, 2017.

Billy Richardson is thinking big. The Democratic state representative from Fayetteville may actually be thinking bigger than is realistic, but he’s on the right track. Education in North Carolina needs to be much better than it is today. The education reform legislation that he has filed is the kind of medicine our public schools really need.

Richardson’s plan is expensive and may not have a prayer in a Republican-dominated legislature that is moving toward further cutting taxes, not increasing them. But what he proposes deserves thoughtful consideration anyway.

Richardson wants to give teachers and administrators big raises. By the fall of 2019, the pay for a starting teacher would rise to more than $51,000 under his plan, from the current $35,000. While lawmakers have given teachers — especially at the entry levels — raises in recent years, teacher pay in North Carolina is still in the country’s bottom 20 percent. That’s not nearly good enough and won’t help struggling school systems keep the best and brightest young teachers in the classroom. The continuing exodus of teachers to better-paying states needs to be halted and the only way to do it is with better paychecks.

The lawmaker also wants to expand pre-kindergarten education to include 3-year-olds. The program today starts when children are 4. Financial assistance for parents would be available year-round, not just during the school year. We hope legislative leaders don’t just dismiss this idea as a frill we can’t afford. It may be that we can’t afford not to do it. Just this week, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio announced that New York public schools will begin offering full-day preschool to all 3-year-olds. The program, which would serve about 62,000 children a year, is expected to cost at least $700 million. But research on early education is increasingly clear and unanimous: The earlier at-risk children begin learning, the less they’re likely to end up in jail, addicted or suffering from other problems that have enormous costs to society.

Richardson’s plan would also restore the North Carolina Teaching Fellows program, which once paid the university tuition for future teachers if they taught in North Carolina after graduation. It would provide full-time mentors for teachers during their first two years in the classroom. It would pay for educational sabbaticals too.

None of this is cheap. Richardson proposes small increases in the state’s sales and personal income taxes. “It’s expensive,” Richardson acknowledges. “But what a nation or a state values, it cultivates.”

In the past, this state has focused well on creating an excellent education system. Our teacher salaries ranked in the middle of the states, even though our cost of living is comparatively low. This brought great teachers to our schools. At the same time, the state also created one of the nation’s top public university systems. But in recent years — especially during and after the recession — that commitment retreated and our government leaders haven’t moved to aggressively restore funding.

With his education reform plan, Richardson is looking ahead a generation or two, introducing measures that can improve the quality of life and ease some of our most persistent social problems. We hope the General Assembly’s leadership can look beyond the next election and see the value of these ideas.

http://www.fayobserver.com/opinion/20170426/our-viewrichardson-education-reform-plan-is-on-target

May 2, 2017 at 7:48 pm
Norm Kelly says:

I know, let's continue to compare our state with the likes of NY, California, and Illinois. Why not pick 3 states where people with money, and businesses with money, are leaving in droves. Why do you think people are moving out of those state? Is it because they can afford to live there and pay all the new fees & taxes on top of the existing? Is it because they are feeling tapped out? So, it only makes sense that NC lawmakers should be looking to the states that are screwing up the most, and COPY them! At least according to the delusional occupants of lib-land!

After the most recent round of tax cuts implemented by Republicans in our legislature, did revenue to the state increase or decrease? That's right, INCREASE! So why is it that libs are whining about raising taxes? Cuz it's what libs do. Cuz without stealing money from citizens, libs can't implement their goofy, failing, socialist programs. The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money. Marg Thatcher I believe. What's the one thing all libs have in common, that all libs must accept in order to be part of the 'in' lib group (besides abortion)? They ALL refuse to recognize FACTS for what they are. So, when cutting taxes increases income to the state, libs insist that raising taxes will have the same effect. And, libs insist, if taxes are raised high enough, ALL lib schemes will be possible. Kinda like implementing the state lottery was going to cure every ill of the state, according to Gov Mike anyway. The only thing Gov Mike never claimed would be fixed by a state lottery is snow on the road. Other than that, libs and Mike told us the state would be in utopia if we would only be smart enough to implement a lottery. How long did that lie last? Libs are still at it. School for 4 yr olds wasn't enough, we couldn't find enough teachers for that, now libs want to implement school for 3 yr olds. Something we can't just NOT afford, but something that puts even more pressure on hiring teachers!

What part of this plan makes sense? Like most things lib: none!