Should NC subsidize solar energy industry? Yes.

Published July 31, 2014

by Betsy McCorkle, Charlotte Observer, July 30, 2014.

“Given your background on Republican political campaigns, why would you take a job working for green energy?” I endured this question for several months after accepting a position as the Director of Government Affairs for the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association. My answer always went something like “By green, you must mean the billions of investment dollars being attracted to North Carolina by entrepreneurs who are developing clean energy projects.”

North Carolina’s policymakers, both Republican and Democrat have a lot to be proud regarding clean energy, especially solar. North Carolina is ranked second in the nation for solar built in 2013 and has become the southeastern hub for exporting solar products and services to surrounding states, keeping jobs in North Carolina and growing our economy. According to a study by Triangle-based RTI International released in April, over $2 billion has been invested directly in North Carolina for renewable energy projects, over $1.6 billion in solar projects alone. The even better news is much of this investment is happening in the state’s most economically depressed areas.

Policies like the Renewable Energy Investment Tax Credit have proven successful in attracting these projects to North Carolina, growing a trained workforce, and giving North Carolina a leadership position in this rapidly growing field. This leads to the next question that I am often asked by my conservative peers when I talk about my job, “Solar cannot survive without help from the government, right?” Most people are intrigued to learn that a free market does not exist for electricity in North Carolina. The traditional free market forces that we often depend upon to pick winners and losers are absent here. North Carolina has a highly regulated electricity market where only utilities can sell power directly to consumers. Consumers are prohibited to choose who to buy their electricity from. The current business model of regulated utilities like Duke Energy encourages them to make large investments in new nuclear or natural gas plants that they can earn a return on as opposed to smaller, modular renewable energy projects where the returns are much smaller or non-existent. The utilities are not to blame; this is how they have been regulated for many decades.

In recognizing that a true free market for electricity may be many years away, North Carolina’s policymakers have used policies such as the Renewable Energy Investment Tax Credit to help level the playing field for smaller power producers, such as solar farm developers.

Georgia more than tripled its solar capacity last year. While the Peach State still trails North Carolina by a significant margin, policymakers there are seeing the benefits of solar in North Carolina and have put new programs in place to attract these investments and projects. Continuation of the Renewable Energy Investment Tax Credit and other clean energy policies will ensure that North Carolina maintains its leadership position. If this credit is allowed to expire, we leave a hole that South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Virginia will work quickly to fill.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, over half of the new installed electrical generating capacity in 2014 came from renewable energy. This represents tens of billions of dollars in new investments.

Clean energy is a train barreling down the tracks; nothing can slow it down. North Carolina’s policymakers just have to decide if they want this train to keep running through North Carolina, bringing jobs and investments along the way, or if we’d like to send it on its way to bring economic prosperity to our neighbors.

Betsy McCorkle is director of government affairs for the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association.

July 31, 2014 at 10:12 am
Norm Kelly says:

Economic prosperity? How much does the solar tax credit cost NC? How much more do rate payers pay for the higher cost of 'alternative' power generation? If you want to tell us about economic prosperity, how about giving us some numbers. To support your claim, you show no proof. If you were a lawyer presenting your case in court, your client would be found guilty because you have done such a poor job of presenting any facts.

How many jobs are supported IN NC by solar power? How many of those jobs are subsidized by government, any level of government? How much does solar generated power cost compared to other sources, like what Duke produces? How much does my electric bill go up because of the additional cost to Duke when they are FORCED BY LAW to purchase expensive solar power? How much does our state export because of solar business in our state?

How much solar power would be generated by these farms if they weren't subsidized by the government? How much would revenues to the state GO DOWN if these solar power companies went out of business? Compare the lost revenue with the current cost of subsidizing. How many jobs would be lost IN NC if the government stopped paying for them? Conversely, how many jobs OUTSIDE OF NC are supported by our subsidization?

We may not have a free-market when it comes to power plants & power generation. When the state allowed Duke & Progress to merge, with the expectation that the leader of Progress would become the leader of the combined entity, did this promote a more free-market based power generation system in the state? Or did it create MORE of a monopoly? The utilities commission should NOT have based ANY of their decision to allow the merger on who they expected to run the combined entity. For this commission to be surprised by the result after it was approved shows just how out of touch with reality they are. They demonstrated that they can't see beyond the end of their collective noses. And collectivism fails automatically!

This post was a waste of ink, paper, electrons, time to read. There was nothing supporting the position presented in the post. This post could easily have been written by a lib - it's chock full of emotion devoid of information and facts. Georgia has looked at the way NC is subsidizing solar power and they have decided this is a train worth getting on? Based on WHAT exactly?! And let's not forget that there's not a single train that doesn't get subsidized. Even the food on Amtrak is subsidized! The food on Amtrak is outrageously expensive, and yet it's still subsidized!? Does an Amtrak hamburger really cost close to $9? Just an example of trains being a perfect metaphor for subsidizing businesses that otherwise would fail if left on their own.

July 31, 2014 at 10:31 am
Mark Stamper says:

Being an investor of Solar stocks, I am all for a continuation of present policies. Solar is growing exponentially. Coal is losing ground at a rapid pace. Solar energy jobs already out number coal industry jobs and continues to grow, while coal industry job creation continues to drop. Solar is the energy of "now" and the future. As the cost of solar cells and panels continue to drop, and the efficiencies of the cells increase, it will not only be equal to the cost energy provided by conventional utilities but will be lower. And believe me, that will be in the very near future. It is happening as I write this. As an example, check out what a company called Solar3d is about to release by the end of this year or sooner.

Being an investor in solar, I constantly see North Carolina mentioned as a leader in solar installation. We are currently 4th in the nation and growing. A number of huge projects have been announced in just the last few months. It would be a shame to go backwards when we are, and continue to be a leader in the solar industry.

August 1, 2014 at 11:12 am
Richard Bunce says:

Since solar is so competitive no need for a market distorting subsidy... just as there should be no subsidy for any other energy generation technology. Let the customers in the market decide what they want to pay for with all the potential pros and cons of the choice they make.

July 31, 2014 at 12:07 pm
Richard Bunce says:

NC should remove the crushing tax and regulation on all electricity generation options including solar then subsidies will no longer be required as the market directed by customers will decide how NC electricity will be generated... setting aside electrical grid considerations for the purposes of this discussion.

July 31, 2014 at 12:09 pm
Richard Bunce says:

"The utilities are not to blame; this is how they have been regulated for many decades."

Government is not the solution, it is the problem, get it out of the way and let the consumers in the market decide.