Should NC subsidize solar industry? No

| July 31, 2014

16f7320fe30da409d1862182e9929f29-question-mark-clip-artby Frances, DeLuca, Civitas Institute, published in Charlotte Observer, July 30, 2014.

Trains are notoriously hard to slow down – even when we need them to. North Carolina’s solar subsidies, some of the most generous in the nation, are sort of like a runaway train that just keeps moving forward. Maybe now is the time to tap the brakes.

With the intention of promoting greater solar usage, North Carolina created an aggressive system of subsidies that is quickly becoming detrimental to the long-term interest of our state. This framework of subsidies artificially suppresses the costs of solar technology and drastically favors one form of energy generation over another – at the expense of North Carolina consumers and businesses.

These subsidies, combined with the requirements of North Carolina Senate Bill 3 (Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard) enacted in 2007, have helped fuel the explosion of solar installations. Senate Bill 3 requires power companies to use a “renewable energy source” for a greater share of their energy production. Next year that will mean 6 percent of electricity production must come from renewable sources and 12 percent by 2021. The power companies are allowed to pass on the higher costs of renewable energy to customers – in other words, you and me. That means we are paying twice for this energy, once with higher taxes to subsidize solar installations and again when we pay higher electricity rates for the more expensive solar power.

Our state currently has a total capacity of roughly 600 megawatts from mostly commercial solar farms. The development of solar power is not a bad thing in its own right. The trouble lies in how the operators of each of these solar ventures are compensated. Currently, projects with capacities no greater than 5 megawatts can be paid what’s known as a “standard offer” by the traditional utility. This means that utility companies are forced to pay solar farms’ inflated rates as mandated by the state, with no ability to negotiate.

Predictably, such an advantage in the marketplace has solar companies chomping at the bit to cash in. In fact, additional solar projects waiting in the wings would more than quadruple our current capacity. Perhaps the current 600 megawatts of power at artificially inflated prices only affects the average person’s power bill a little, but what about 2,400? Where does it end?

On the residential side, solar users are benefiting at the expense of those without the means to pay for this expensive technology. Those who can afford to buy and install the latest equipment are also able to sell their excess generation – sometimes referred to as “net metering” – back to the utility at an inflated price. They still enjoy access to the electric grid that distributes and transmits the energy, while being compensated for their excess power at a price that does not take into consideration any of the costs of maintaining the electric grid.

Those without solar panels are left to make up the difference. Worse yet, this system of subsidies is only available to those who own their own homes and can afford to install solar systems. Renters and lower-income consumers are locked out of subsidies and, to add insult to injury, are asked to pay for it.

Think of a cable company being forced to buy your home videos at a set price, but only if they are produced with a device that costs as much as a car. Oh yes, and the government will subsidize your purchase of that new recording device. Those with the money to buy this expensive recording device are delighted to let everyone else pay higher cable bills as the cable company pays them for their videos.

Given the circumstances, it is no surprise that North Carolina’s utilities commission is examining the costs that utilities pay for this energy. Without judicious action by the commission, our electricity providers will be forced to make decisions limiting their ability to provide consumers the most reliable and cost-effective power.

Spending other people’s money is fun, but North Carolina can’t keep spiraling down this road of government largesse and state-mandated inequality.

Undoubtedly, North Carolinians value energy options that are reliable, energy-efficient and affordable. But our elected leaders and regulators must be aware of the consequences that come with artificially favoring one technology over another. Let’s encourage and support our policymakers to do what is right and fair for all electricity consumers in our state. North Carolina deserves a reasonable and equitable approach to energy planning. It’s time to put the brakes on this runaway solar subsidy train.

Francis X. De Luca is president of the Civitas Institute.

Category: NC SPIN Perspectives - Opinions from NC Leaders & Organizations

Comments (1)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Norm Kelly says:

    2007 is 7 years ago. Wonder who was in control of the Senate at that time? Would look it up but can’t easily find this info.
    I’m guessing it was the Demoncrat Party. This seems obvious because it’s the libs who want to force stuff down our throats that don’t make sense. It’s the demon party that does things like use tax money to ‘subsidize’ businesses that otherwise would fail, then allow the company to pass the additional cost of their product/service onto the consumer. Forcing us to pay twice for the product/service.
    Does this make sense? No. Should solar power be allowed to stand on it’s own? European countries, decades ahead of the US in socialism, tried subsidizing the heck out of ‘alternative’ power. They have since backed off this scheme a great deal if not completely.
    Why would the socialists of Europe back off of subsidizing alternative power? Because it was simply too expensive. They realized they were costing taxpayers twice, and that taxpayers could no longer afford it. The use of taxpayer dollars on such a scheme was costing too much to be sustainable, the production was too low for the cost, and the consumer was paying twice, forcing the economy to slow. The net affect/effect was that ‘alternative’ power sources were too expensive to continue and costing too many politicians their cushy jobs when taxpayers decided to replace the ones who wanted to continue the outrageous scheme.
    Can Americans learn anything from socialist countries in Europe? We can but I’m not sure we will.
    First, Europe is decades ahead of us on the socialist experiment path. They have discovered it’s failures. Some from England tried to tell us not to implement socialized medicine BEFORE we did it. Why? Because they had experience with it and it’s failures were obvious. Just like our demon leaders told us to use the VA health system as a model for how well Obamacancer would work in the US. The challenge is that the VA health system has shown us EXACTLY how poorly socialized medicine works, and the demons hate it! But it will fail anyway. Europe tried subsidizing businesses that can’t stand on their own merits. Like ‘alternative’ power sources. They have backed off. The current occupier tried paying off his supporters, people in the solar industry, with monumental failure as the result. His schemes cost us taxpayers dearly. The result was NOT alternative power sources. The result was simply the same as experienced in Europe – wasted money and gobs of it. (for libs ‘gobs’ means lots, enough to be noticeable.)
    Second, in France, they get a lot more of their power from nuclear plants than we do. The French are not known for much noteworthy. But if even the French can successfully run nuclear power plants, why are the demons in the US so afraid of it? Why do the demons believe Americans are so much worse at running a nuclear power plant than THE FRENCH!?!?! If the Socialist Party of the US would get off the idea that allowing uncontrolled immigration across our borders, that this would somehow inexplicably bolster our economy, it’s POSSIBLE that they would see the holes in their alternative power source fiascos. Possible. Not likely, just possible. They still insist that allowing illegal aliens to become citizens, on the fast track, will increase take-home pay for Americans. No thought process there either! Just seems obvious to me that socialist schemes have failure built into them. And the leaders and supporters of the Socialist Party of the US have not caught up with reality. Follow the money. Somehow, somewhere, someone or a lot of someone’s back pockets are being lined because of the schemes of the socialists.