Stumbling blocks to healthcare reform

Published September 29, 2017

By Tom Campbell

by Tom Campbell, Producer and Moderator of NC SPIN, September 28, 2017.

It is evident that Congress is unable to pass meaningful and significant healthcare reform. There are two major obstacles in the way. They are health insurance and the government.

Health insurance is a relatively recent phenomenon. While there were some early and isolated attempts to institute health insurance, the practice really gained momentum during World War II. Most able-bodied men and women were needed in military service, but in order to supply our burgeoning military the private sector was required to ramp up production to previously unimagined and historic levels. At its peak, for example, a B24 bomber, with some 1.5 million parts, came off the assembly line every 63 minutes. Offsetting that increased demand for immediate output it wasn’t surprising that wages and material costs increased rapidly.

In response, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9250 that established the office of Economic Stabilization. To ensure that civilians did not forsake their duty to serve our nation in favor of higher paying private sector jobs, this agency established wage and price controls that prohibited the private sector from paying wages substantially higher than the military. But there were no restrictions on offering benefits to workers, and many private sector employers offered free housing. Others promised healthcare benefits and, to manage the cost-risk exposure, turned to insurers. The health insurance industry suddenly became a major factor in the healthcare equation.

In 1943, the IRS provided powerful fertilizer to the benefit, declaring that employer-based healthcare insurance was exempt from taxes. In 1940, fewer than 9 percent of Americans had health insurance. By 1950, 50 percent enjoyed the benefit, rising to two-thirds being covered by 1960. This tax break is the single largest tax expenditure in the U.S. today.

America won’t find meaningful and significant reforms to healthcare without reckoning with the insurance issue. But this won’t be easy. Employers don’t want to lose this benefit. Not only is it tax-deductible but they also avoid having to pay employees higher wages. Employees don’t want to lose the benefit and neither do insurance companies. Even though many insurers are nonprofits, health insurance is profitable business to most of them. Further complicating reform is the problem of how to offset the highly escalating costs of healthcare for those not covered by health insurance. The Affordable Care Act attempted a solution but, as we have seen, the legislation and subsequent regulations were fraught with problems. Our current leadership appears more interested in repealing Obamacare than fixing it. To date, they’ve been successful in doing neither.

The second big stumbling block is government involvement. America has evolved into a healthcare system that is neither private, nor public. It is a complicated combination of both. Many vocal and powerful voices want to get the government out of the healthcare business, but that isn’t likely. Millions are provided benefits from Medicaid and Medicare, not to mention coverage for veterans, our military and current and retired government employees. Once provided, a benefit is virtually impossible to eliminate or even reduce.

A growing number have concluded that we won’t reform healthcare in America until a single-payer, basic level of healthcare is provided all Americans. This solution is the least attractive choice for many, but it may become the most acceptable solution to fix our healthcare system.

September 30, 2017 at 11:27 am
Clint Midkiff says:

We have a single payer for those of us over 65, Medicare. I'd rather have higher cost in federal taxes than state. If the states handle, it will be a disaster, the extent of which will depend on our state legislature. Unfortunately, I don't trust our state to do what's needed, and it doesn't matter what party is in control

October 14, 2017 at 12:04 pm
Norm Kelly says:

Socialized medicine is NOT a fix but IS the final nail in the coffin of health care. It is lovingly referred to as single payer because it sounds less hazardous to the average person, less intrusive into our every day lives.

The solution, and the only solution that can possibly work, is to get less gov't involvement in health care, not more involved. The problem started way back when because gov't got involved. Putting more of a burden on gov't that is ill-equipped to do the job they are supposed to do, won't improve gov't response to the issue. If they can't do the job they are tasked with, which has been resoundingly proven over many decades with different parties in power, then giving them more tasks to do won't improve their success rate.

Socialized medicine is failing everywhere in the world. Except of course for Mike Moore in Cuba. The Cuban system is the model for the world, and should be implemented in the US as fast as possible. The real challenge with Obamacancer is that it didn't implement the Cuban plan all at once, it was a typically-lib scheme to implement the failure slowly so the boiling lobsters wouldn't realize they were boiling to death.

So, get gov't OUT of health care. Provide tax incentives to those already on gov't health benefits or block grants to states based on relative population. Stop providing gov't benefits to new people. Allow individuals and businesses to negotiate directly with insurance providers or health care providers. Allow individuals and businesses to purchase insurance across state lines. Stop providing tax benefits to corporations that provide health benefits to employees. Allow all of us to once again buy the insurance package that meets OUR needs instead of some gov't lacky! If I want catastrophic only coverage, provided by an insurer in Oregon, so be it; my choice; stay out of my life and let ME make decisions for ME and MY family. See the important words in that statement. For those libs who can't see reality in front of their faces, which is the typical lib, they are 'ME', 'MY', 'MINE'. These are MY decisions, this is MY money, this is MY family. So why do you get to make any of MY decisions for me? And why should you be expected to pay for MY benefits? Aren't you tired of paying for MY families expenses? At what point should tax payers revolt against involuntarily paying for some other persons costs, and start worrying about our own costs and benefits?

The only way to let ME pay for MY benefits and expenses is to get gov't totally out of MY life! Will it cost SOME citizens more than other citizens? Probably. But that's what neighbors are for. Our nation simply steps up when people are in need. But we do it voluntarily. We typically balk when forced to take care of our neighbor. Especially when it's gov't doing the taking care because they are just so unqualified to do it, do such a poor job of it, and waste too many resources while doing it. So, let's force them to stop doing it.

First step, stop allowing central planners to get between you & your medical/health care! Less gov't NOT more!