Upholding career status

Published June 5, 2015

Editorial by Durham Herald-Sun, June 4, 2015.

The picture has brightened a bit lately for North Carolina’s embattled teachers, and they

got a significant boost Tuesday from the state Court of Appeals.

In a 2-1 decision, the court upheld a lower court ruling that the state legislature acted

unconstitutionally when it revoked career status for teachers who had earned it. “We have

no trouble concluding that the trial court was correct in its determination that the Career

Status Repeal substantially impairs Plaintiff’s vested contractual rights,” Judge Linda

Stephens wrote in the majority opinion.

Eliminating career status was an early and high-priority of Republicans when the party

secured the governor’s mansion as well as majorities in both houses of the legislature

three years ago.  For many in the new majority, the status has always been a symbol of

what’s wrong in their view with the state’s educational system.

Whether that’s true or not – we happen to think career status is, at the very least, greatly

overstated as a barrier to improving education – a Superior Court judge and now an

appeals court majority have said that doesn’t matter. Removing it violates the state’s

constitution.

he victory for teachers is only a partial one. Since the decision was based on the state’s

contractual obligations, the courts found no barrier for the state to discontinue career

status for new teachers. Over time, barring a shift in legislative sentiment, more and more

teachers will be moving forward in their careers without obtaining that protection.

Even before the court’s ruling, however, Durham Public Schools and other systems had

moved to restore the protections at the local level.

Antipathy toward career status has long been sharpened by calling it “teacher tenure,”

invoking for many the much stronger protection granted college and university faculty at

a certain point in their careers.

In fact, career status did little more than provide hearings, appeals and other due process

rights for teachers who are dismissed.  hat makes eliminating bad teachers a bit more

difficult, but that level of difficulty also helps prevent unfair or unfounded dismissals

based on factors other than performance.

Do many school administrators act too timidly to oust a bad teacher from the classroom?

No doubt they do.  But the solution lies in hiring, promoting and empowering strong

principals with a focus on instruction and a determination to coach and nurture teachers

to achieve results – or to fairly and equitably show them the door if they don’t.

Legislative leaders said they are studying their appeal options. Appeal is certainly their

right, but it would be better to drop this ill-advised effort and move on.