Voucher ruling raises troubling questions

Published July 31, 2015

Editorial by Rocky Mount Telegram, July 31, 2015.

With last week’s N.C. Supreme Court ruling in favor of “opportunity scholarships,” North Carolina becomes a state full of educational diversity. That might sound nice on paper, but how does the legislature propose to pay for it all?

Public schools in the Twin Counties alone have plenty of kids who would benefit from a $4,200 per-pupil stipend every year to attend a private school. Almost 70 percent of the 16,000 students in Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools and 85 percent of the 7,500 students in Edgecombe County Public Schools are on a free or reduced price lunch program. If just a quarter of all of those students applied for vouchers, where would the state find money for them? And how would a financially decimated public school system pick up the pieces and move on to educate the rest of our kids?

Those are real issues that school boards and superintendents in systems all over the state will have to wrestle with in the very near future.

While those folks are struggling with finances, parents would be smart to ask some questions, also. For example, how does academic performance at the private school I’m considering compare to performance at the public school where my child is currently enrolled?

Good luck finding an apples-to-apples answer to that. Private schools don’t have to test kids by curriculum standards required of public schools by the N.C. Department of Public Instruction. Educators in private schools don’t even have to be certified by anyone to teach.

If the N.C. General Assembly is going to require standardized testing in public schools as part of its accountability policy, shouldn’t it require the same of private schools where voucher recipients are spending public tax dollars?

The Supreme Court might have cleared the air on vouchers in North Carolina, but the remaining questions are likely to leave us in the fog for a while to come.

http://www.rockymounttelegram.com/opinion/our-views/vouchers-ruling-raises-troubling-questions-2945973

July 31, 2015 at 9:51 am
bruce stanley says:

Like the leadership of any business facing competition, school boards and superintendents are going to need to adapt, and hopefully will become better as a result. Competition makes us better.

July 31, 2015 at 10:29 am
Richard L Bunce says:

"If just a quarter of all of those students applied for vouchers, where would the state find money for them? And how would a financially decimated public school system pick up the pieces and move on to educate the rest of our kids?"

Really? The Education Voucher is about half of the average funding per student of traditional government schools. When a student uses an Education Voucher to attend an alternate school the per pupil funding of the traditional government school actually increases. I am going to assume the RMT Editor is actually smart enough to know this and so is purposely misleading their readers. Just another Government Education Industrial Complex sycophant.

July 31, 2015 at 10:32 am
Richard L Bunce says:

Oh and all this concern about children in private schools... has the RMT ever run an editorial expressing concern about the children of all their wealthy progressive friends who attend private schools? No, I didn't think so... just keep them poor kids out eh?

July 31, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Penny Sandrock says:

They wont have to try very hard to compete with the substandard teaching that goes on in many of the religious schools, bad science, bad math bad history, etc. I dont like tax dollars going to religious schools with a lack of good teachers or required overview testing. Please leave your nasty politics out of the children of NCs future.

August 3, 2015 at 3:16 pm
Richard L Bunce says:

Parents will now decide which school their child will attend and with education vouchers relatively low income parents will have choices as their relatively high income neighbors have had for years. I don't like my tax dollars going to failed traditional government schools... and I do not like government education bureaucrats having more input on a child's education then their parents.