Actions speak louder than words in voting access and safety.
Published September 15, 2022
When it comes to keeping voting in North Carolina accessible and secure the state’s Republicans seem to be saying one thing and then doing another.
They say they want voting accessible, the rules and procedures open and transparent and polling places to be secure.
But then they block regulations and file lawsuits that limit voters’ opportunities to cast ballots and would actually make polling places less secure. Rather than acting to give voters more faith in the electoral process, these actions breed confusion and mistrust.
“When I train observers, I say when you get in the voting enclosure and you shut up. Don’t talk to anybody. Don’t say anything. You bring a notepad and you take notes. You serve your term. You walk out. You go call whoever you need to call to work with any issues if there’s any there. You don’t talk to the voters. You don’t talk to the elections workers. You don’t try to go through doors you’re not allowed to go through,” he said.
“I don’t have any sympathy for anybody that gets kicked out of a voting enclosure because they confronted somebody or have a problem.
There is nothing in the rules and regulations for observers that limits their appropriate view of the elections process. The clear directions help assure that EVERYONE – elections officials, polling place workers, designated observers and voters – has a clear understanding of polling place etiquette. Emily Post might even approve.
Both the deadline for receipt of mail-in absentee ballots and the guidance for behavior of designated polling place observers have been in practice in previous elections. They are not new, don’t limit voter participation, don’t diminish polling place security nor the integrity of the voting process.
What is to be gained with this lawsuit? Mostly, it is another effort by the General Assembly’s leaders to grab power and upset the state Constitutional balance of power between the other branches of state government – the courts and executive (governor and Council of State).
What is achieved by a baseless legal action that actually seeks to breed distrust and plant doubts about the conduct of the election?
We’d like to feel that Phillip Strach was speaking from the heart when he was talking at the N.C. Trusted Elections Tour in a courtroom in Smithfield – and that he was saying what he was paid to impart in the lawsuit filed days later.