Conservatives differ on details, not principles

Published June 2, 2014

By John Hood

by John Hood, John Locke Foundation and NC SPIN panelist, June 2, 2014.

After November 2012, when Pat McCrory was elected North Carolina’s first Republican governor since 1992 and voters reelected a GOP majority in both legislative chambers for the first time since the 1860s, displaced Democrats, liberal editorialists, and left-wing activists began pursuing a strategy as transparent as glass.

Their goal has been to pit McCrory, House Speaker Thom Tillis, and Senate leader Phil Berger against each other. Their tactics have included elevating relatively minor disagreements between House and Senate, or between the legislative and executive branches, into major conflagrations that supposedly threaten the survival of conservative governance in Raleigh.

In this case, subtlety might have served critics better. The Republicans know precisely what the Left is up to. They’re not falling for it.

To be sure, there are some policy disagreements. Two initiatives from the first year of the McCrory administration, reforming Medicaid and privatizing economic-development programs, have yet to make much progress in the General Assembly. The 2014-15 budget senators passed last week makes it clear they want more cost savings in Medicaid than the governor’s plan, centered on accountable care organizations, is capable of generating. On job recruitment, lawmakers in both chambers want to ensure that the proposed nonprofit is sufficiently transparent and free from conflicts of interest.

On the budget itself, the Senate offers much-larger average pay raises to teachersthan McCrory’s proposal did, an average of 11 percent for the 2014-15 school year. The Senate is also more generous to the University of North Carolina system while spending hundreds of millions of dollars less than the governor proposed on Medicaid, non-teacher positions in the public schools, and a number of other programs.

These are, however, debates within a general framework of conservative reform in North Carolina, not about whether that framework is the correct one. On teacher pay, for example, the Senate plan and the governor’s plan aren’t diametrically opposed. With some adjustments, they can be complementary — offering larger average raises than McCrory initially proposed, while spending more dollars over time on performance pay and other alternatives to the current, flawed salary schedule.

Keep in mind that all three teams — the Senate, the House, and the McCrory administration — have cooperated far more than they have competed. Their accomplishments have included pro-growth tax reform, sweeping regulatory reforms, a major rewrite of the state’s transportation-funding formula, a new approach to unemployment insurance, expanded choice and competition in education, and a pathway to exploration of North Carolina’s potential energy reserves.

Legislators have, in other words, enacted major legislation on nearly every issue they campaigned on in 2010 and 2012. And McCrory has signed major legislation on nearly every agenda item he listed at the start of his administration.

North Carolina’s liberal organizations and editorial pages aren’t upset because McCrory, Tillis, Berger, and other Republican leaders are too divided by disagreements to be effective. On the contrary, the Left is upset because McCrory, Tillis, Berger, and other Republican leaders have, in fact, been very effective — reflecting their fundamental agreement on most of North Carolina’s key issues.

The differences among them lie primarily in the pace and structure of conservative reform. Only if your knowledge of conservative ideas comes from watching tirades on MSNBC and swapping conspiracy theories on the Internet would you be surprised that conservatives often disagree on the details of policy implementation while sharing the same goals and principles.

Here’s what I think will happen. The Senate, House, and the administration will resolve their differences on teacher pay and spending priorities, adjusting the 2014-15 budget in a timely fashion. And they’ll continue to work through differences on other matters without clubbing each other to political death, as their critics so obviously and desperately want them to do.

Meanwhile, the Left will continue watching tirades on MSNBC, swapping conspiracy theories on the Internet, and endlessly debating the relative influence of Pat McCrory, Phil Berger, and Thom Tillis. Throw in some Occupy/Moral Mondaytheatrics and pro-Kay Hagan stunts, and you’ve got a pretty good picture of what North Carolina politics will look like in the coming weeks and months.

The Republic will survive. Conservative reforms will advance. The two trends are related.

http://www.carolinajournal.com/daily_journal/index.html

June 2, 2014 at 10:40 am
Norm Kelly says:

Paying attention to the antics played out by the left, in the media & lib pols, is quite funny. Predictable. But funny.

The important thing is to remember to ask every lib politician the IMPORTANT questions; the ones they refuse to EVER answer. These are the questions their allies in the media refuse to ask because it will put their friends on the hot seat, so to speak. And it's so obvious that the majority of what used to be 'news media' are now simply the propaganda arm of the socialist party in America. If the demons, at any level, put out a press release the media picks it up, reports it, never questions the content, never questions whether ANY of the information is true or accurate. They just robotically repeat.

Question directed to lib pol: what, specifically, will you do with taxes to encourage economic growth?

Question directed to lib pol: what, specifically, do you propose to insure elections are free from fraud?

Question directed to lib pol: what, specifically, do you propose to insure illegal aliens are not allowed to vote?

Question directed to demon party in general: what are your specific plans for encouraging PRIVATE SECTOR job growth in the state?

Question directed to demon party in general: what plans do you have that are different this time around from the plans you implemented last time you controlled Raleigh? Specifically, your plan for unemployment payments put the state in debt by 10% of the total budget. Specifically, you had no plan in place when you took the loan from Washington, to pay unemployment benefits, for repayment of the loan. What will you do different this time to insure the budget is not so out of balance?

Question for demon party in general: Your party has proposed expanding medicare/medicaid in order to conform more closely with the central planners. How will you pay for the expanded costs to the state when the central planners change their mind on paying for this expansion? The central planners are broke, the country is OVER $17TRILLION in debt, so the central planners can NOT continue to pay for socialized medicine in the future. How will YOUR PLAN pay for the outrageous costs of covering residents when the central planners stop paying 90% of the cost? In the meantime, how will you pay for the 10% that the central planners have already told us they refuse to pay? Where in the budget will you get that 10%?

In general, will your plan for the future, if we are stupid enough to re-elect you to the majority in Raleigh, be any different from your plan of the past? Your plan in the past was raise taxes, raise spending, pay more people more money for not working, raise compensation packages for government employees even when wages & benefits for private sector employees are falling, change every temporary tax to a permanent tax, increase regulation on private business while at the same time having government employees who refuse to do their jobs. What will be different this time around that we should even consider letting you back in control? How will your plans actually improve the economic position of the average, majority, of NC legal citizens? Besides paying companies to move their operations to our state, what is your plan for encouraging more businesses to do business here? Besides shutting down any/all production of 'energy' in NC, what are your plans for off-shore drilling? Even if you oppose fracking, how do you explain opposing off-shore drilling that has proven to be safe and quite profitable for the state?

June 2, 2014 at 11:23 am
James Barrett says:

Pat McCrory campaigned as a moderate, but the agenda that he has signed on to by signing these bills is extremely right-wing. He broke promises on tax reform being revenue neutral and no additional abortion restrictions for obvious examples. That is what has most people upset -- the NCGA received almost 500k fewer GOP votes than Pat did, but they are implementing their own radical agenda, not what most NC citizens want.