Film tax credits necessary

Published December 22, 2013

Editorial by Winston-Salem Journal, December 21, 2013.

Gov. Pat McCrory and state officials last week celebrated the job opportunities and near-record economic impact generated by the state’s film industry this year. But there was something floating in the pool at this party that was politely ignored.

That something is the pending demise of the state’s tax credits for film production companies – some of the most generous in the country – that industry observers say are responsible for much of the activity the state has experienced.

“I'm hoping that our state legislators recognize how important this lucrative and highly competitive business is to the state’s economy, and this region’s economy, and extend the film incentive in its current form,” Rebecca Clark, executive director of the N.C. Piedmont Triad Film Commission, told the Journal’s Richard Craver.

We do, too. A tax credit of 25 percent on in-state spending up to $20 million by film production companies no doubt contributed to the $254 million economic impact in 2013 cited by state officials – the second-highest level in history. Production companies also receive refunds if the value of their credit is more than their tax liability.

Production companies created 4,000 crew jobs and 25,000 other opportunities, such as film extras, the statement from McCrory’s office said. There were 5,700 film production days in more than 30 counties, including Forsyth County.

“The film industry continues to have a major impact on the state’s economy and provide job opportunities for thousands of North Carolinians,” said Sharon Decker, the state’s Commerce secretary.

Among the productions this year were two feature films — “The Ultimate Life” and “You Are Here” — that were filmed in the Triad. Television shows produced in the state include “Homeland,” “Sleepy Hollow,” “Under the Dome,” “Banshee” and “Eastbound and Down.”

Film industry observers say eliminating the tax incentive would mean the end of filming in North Carolina. Other states, including South Carolina and Georgia, offer incentives. The News & Observer of Raleigh reported earlier this year that the South Carolina legislature fast-tracked an incentives bill to ensure a TV series continued filming in Charleston. And New Mexico, which had a generous tax incentive similar to North Carolina’s, cut back its program and saw a drop in filming. As a result the governor and legislators came back with an even larger tax incentive.

Opponents of the tax credit say the film industry generates a limited number of full-time jobs. In addition, ending the tax credit was a trade-off for lowering corporate income taxes, which they believe will lead to broader job creation in the state.

We don’t disagree with tax reform in general. But the film industry is unique and part of the economic and social fabric of North Carolina. It’s in our DNA. We’re fortunate in Winston-Salem to be the home of one of the most prestigious schools of filmmaking in the country, the School of Filmmaking at the UNC School of the Arts.

The tax credits “are vitally important to the success of our alumni, and our ability to recruit the most promising students and faculty,” Susan Ruskin, the dean of the School of Filmmaking, told the Journal.

She’s right. We encourage legislators and the governor to reconsider the decision to eliminate the tax credit and instead extend it in a form that keeps North Carolina in the filmmaking game.

December 22, 2013 at 9:08 am
Richard Bunce says:

This shows the NC taxes and regulations are too onerous for all businesses and instead of State bureaucrats picking winners and losers how about we loosen taxes and regulations on all State businesses?

December 22, 2013 at 7:50 pm
Norm Kelly says:

So much for 'their fair share'.

When the tax credit exceeds the tax liability, the state PAYS the filmmakers? This is absurd.

How about, if it's mandatory that this special tax break exists for this one industry, at least we cut it off at the point where the tax credit exceeds the tax liability? There's no sense in paying someone to do business here. Why should this single business be treated different from every other business? Is it because it's a business liked/supported by libs?

I hear, way too often, libs refer to oil producers as 'big oil', threaten to take away the tax deductions that are available to other businesses calling them 'federal subsidies', and demonize oil producers in every other way possible. But, once again, the libs are telling lies about 'big oil'. They are not getting federal subsidies. Apple might be. GE is. Facebook might be. But 'big oil' pays more in taxes than it reaps from tax deductions. Shouldn't 'big film' also be paying taxes?

If this business gets a tax credit why doesn't my business get a tax credit? Why doesn't my friends business get a tax credit. We do business here in NC (theoretically). But we have to pay taxes. Which state politician do I need to buy in order to get a tax credit that could exceed my tax liability, such that I get paid by the state to do business here? Or am I ineligible for this luxury treatment by the state because I am so vocally opposed to libs? Does my political position automatically deny me access to tax credits? Why is it that politicians should be deciding which businesses get 'special' treatment, while others are penalized more in order to support the favorites of the politicians? Is it just POSSIBLE that if every business doing business in NC were treated exactly the same way with state taxes and credits, more businesses would realize that NC is business friendly and WANT to move here? If every business doing business in our state were paying taxes, at the same rate, then isn't is just POSSIBLE that everyone's taxes could be reduced and the state MIGHT get more income? Libs like to believe that changes/increases in tax policy have no affect on business or personal decisions. Yet when it comes to offering favored business status, for tax purposes, they definitely believe that policy has an affect on decisions. One more instance of libs showing that they believe opposites really can be true.