Published August 18, 2018
By Tom Campbell
by Tom Campbell, Producer and Moderator, NC SPIN, August 18, 2018
Dallas Woodhouse, Executive Director of the state Republican Party, lobbed a grenade into a Friday discussion about the Constitutional Amendments on November's ballot, by suggesting that our Supreme Court Justices might be impeached that if they prevent them from going to a vote.
Was this a threat to intimidate our high court, is there some genuine discussion taking place about how to punish the court if they don't hew the legislative line or was it just Dallas being Dallas?
Whatever, it was it won't help the chances for the amendments. In the first place Woodhouse obviously doesn't know Chief Justice Mark Martin very well or he would know Martin's not the type to suffer threats graciously. Secondly, the three judge panel hasn't even ruled definitively on the amendments and there's no guarantee the matter would even be appealed to the Supremes. Gerry Cohen, the legal advisor to our legislators for years, says there's little evidence to suggest that their action could be an impeachable offense. Here's what our statutes say: We're also betting the average voter knows little about the 6 amendments that will be on the ballot and, as is usually the case, would likely vote in favor of them. However all this additional controversy and publicity might even elevate it on the radar where that voter might question...and might even vote against one or more of them. The quieter the better, for those who want them all to pass.
It's getting to the point where politics in North Carolina is almost as entertaining (almost, I said) as what it taking place in the Capitol City. Thank goodness it gives us plenty of fodder to discuss on NC SPIN... we'll talk about all of this on next week on UNC-TV Friday night at 7:30 and again Sunday morning at 6 a.m.
August 18, 2018 at 10:29 am
Richard L Bunce says:
Lot's of talk about checks and balances in government of late. One of the important levers to accomplish that is the Legislatures Impeachment power. Should the NCSC rule the proposed amendments to be not understandable by the voters I would find that to be malfeasance in office.