McCrory cautious on unemployment insurance during Sunday show interview

Published January 10, 2014

by Mark Binker, WRAL.com, January 9, 2014.

Gov. Pat McCrory would not commit to putting North Carolina back into the federal program that provides long-term unemployment benefits during an interview on the N.C. Spin television program this week.

North Carolinians lost access to long-term unemployment benefits last summer after the state changed how much it would pay workers when they first became unemployed. Federally-funded benefits take over after state benefits expire.

The change in state law violated federal rules and, as of July 1, ended benefits for workers who had exhausted their state unemployment benefits. A bill now moving through Congress would reauthorize the national long-term unemployment program and restore North Carolina's eligibility to participate in the federally funded long-term program.

N.C. Spin host Tom Campbell asked McCrory, a Republican who has just finished his first year in office, if North Carolina would opt in if given the opportunity.

"The answer would be 'no' if the administration or Congress would require us to raise our unemployment compensation above South Carolina, Virginia and Tennessee," McCrory said.

The current federal bill "grandfathers" North Carolina in, meaning North Carolina would not have to change its current benefits system. Contacted after the N.C. Spin taping, a spokesman for McCrory declined to say what the state might do if the final federal bill would require no changes to the state system.

"We will be happy to provide additional comment if and when that legislation is passed," spokesman Ryan Tronovitch said.

McCrory this week celebrated the drop in North Carolina's unemployment rate over the past year, which he said was evidence state unemployment reforms were working. Economists say that much of the drop in the rate has to do with people dropping out of the workforce rather than new jobs being created.

Asked about this by Campbell, McCrory stood by the state's reforms.

"We had the ninth-most-generous unemployment compensation in the country," McCrory said. "We were having a lot of people move here, frankly, from other areas to get unemployment ... People were moving here because of our very generous benefits, and then, of course, we had more debt. I personally think that more people got off unemployment and either got jobs or moved back to where they came from."

Chris Fitzsimon, director of the liberal N.C. Policy Watch think tank and a regular panelist on N.C. Spin, said it would be "tragic" if North Carolina didn't opt into a reauthorized federal program and scoffed at the idea that people would move to North Carolina just to collect unemployment.

"That is ludicrous, and I'd love to see some evidence that was actually the case," Fitzsimon said. "The labor force is smaller. That doesn't mean they've left the state. That means they've given up. It's astonishing that the governor would make that claim without any evidence to support it."

This week's episode of N.C. Spin will air at 6:30 a.m. Sunday. Other highlights from the program include:

  • McCrory continued to publicly back state Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Aldona Wos, who leads an agency that has frequently been in the news for problems administering key programs. "The last thing we need to do right now is again have another turnover in management," McCrory said, saying of Wos, "I'm lucky to have her."
  • McCrory said he hoped this year's budget would provide raises for both teachers and state workers. "We've got to have teacher raises," he said, declining to answer what specific proposal he might put forward. "We hope to come up with something pretty soon."
  • Among his key priorities for 2014, McCrory said he would continue to push for changes to the state Medicaid system as a way to control costs and will continue to push the state toward allowing natural gas drilling both on-shore and off.
  • Asked about other priorities for the coming year, McCrory said, "My wife would kill me if I didn't say a puppy mill bill ... to at least require puppy mills to give basic food and water and shelter."

January 10, 2014 at 9:52 am
Norm Kelly says:

Years ago I read one of those cute sayings on a tea bag tab. It said something like 'some minds are like concrete, all mixed up and permanently set'. This may be true. But a more accurate reading of this would be: 'the liberal mind is like concrete, all mixed up and permanently set'. Even when presented with facts, liberals do everything they can to avoid them, ignore that they exist, or question the organization that put the facts together as being a supporter of conservatives.

When the White House/this administration reports that unemployment has come down by x% points, liberals simply suck it down. When a conservative asks how this is possible if fewer than 200k jobs were created, liberals simply say that this White House said it's so, therefore it is. When some conservative points out that the unemployment rate fell only because of the number of people who dropped out of the job market, gave up looking for a job, those same liberals call the conservative a racist and end the discussion. The only reason anyone would question the validity of the number or the information coming from this White House is because they obviously are a racist. Looking at the facts reveals that the conservative is correct, and that liberals are simply burying their (collective) heads in the sand.

When McCrory points out that the unemployment rate fell AFTER benefits were reduced or eliminated, here come the libs claiming that the reason the rate fell is because those people stopped looking for jobs. Just like the budget, where libs like to count the same money in 2 different places in order to claim the budget is balanced, they want it both ways with the unemployment stats. When it's His High Holiness (drug reference intended!) who claims that unemployment came down because of His strong economic plan, libs love it and promote it. When a Republican claims unemployment came down, libs refuse to accept it and state, strongly, that it's only because of those who dropped out. Both ways. (insert your own joke there!)

The challenge with lib claims these days is that we all have the ability to do our own research. We can check out on the web what the real unemployment numbers are, and how they were calculated. We can also do research to find out that the state didn't WANT to cut off unemployment benefits. The state asked the feds for permission to keep the payments going but at a reduced rate. Rather than continue to allow people to collect money, the feds responded that it was impossible to keep the payments in place if they were reduced at all. Typical of libs, it's either their way or no way. Either you continue to go into debt to follow the lib rules, or you purposely hurt people. Fortunately, out state legislature decided we could no longer go into debt to pay people not to work. The feds decided that unemployment benefits MUST be cut off. But then the libs who decided this claim that it's the Republicans in the NCGA who are cold, heartless, calculating. The Republicans wanted to continue unemployment benefits, but it was the LIBS who refused to let it happen. Facts. Funny things. Research. Too easy to let libs slide anymore. Too easy to find the information for ourselves and then hold politicians, all politicians, accountable. It's just so much easier to prove a lib wrong. And so much more satisfying. Smug, arrogant, libs are so much fun to knock off their pedestals.