Metros dominate NC economy

Published November 21, 2013

by Dan Barkin, Editor's blog in News and Observer, November 20, 2013.

North Carolina is a vast state, nearly 54,000 square miles from Manteo to Murphy. But most of its economy is jammed into a handful of metropolitan cities and counties, like Raleigh. The seven largest metro areas generate nearly 70 percent of the state’s economy, according to data recently released by the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

The mayors put out the report, called U.S. Metro Economies, to make the point that the country’s urban areas are the engines of the nation’s economy, and thus should be getting more love from Washington.

The breakdown in North Carolina shows that the Charlotte metropolitan area is responsible for 25.5 percent of the state’s economy. Raleigh-Cary (13.5 percent) and Durham (8.7 percent) metro areas generate a total of 22.2 percent. I combined them because they make up the Triangle, and it makes more sense to treat them as a single economic entity. So right there, the Triangle and Charlotte are nearly half the state’s economy.

The Triad weighs in at 13.1 percent (Greensboro, 8.1) and Winston-Salem (5.0); Fayetteville has 4.1 percent, and Wilmington has 3.4.

These are dry stats but they highlight why there is always some tension in the state’s economic development strategy. It is easier for North Carolina to recruit out-of-state companies to come to urban areas because that’s where most people want to live. Companies seeking to relocate either want to be able to convince their most valued employees to relocate with them, or they want to be able to easily hire educated and skilled new workers. It is easier to do these two things if you relocate to a place like Charlotte or Raleigh. So the rich (the metro areas) get richer, and their share of the gross state product goes up.

But politicans also like to give lip service to helping the rural areas, which have suffered from massive manufacturing plant closings and have disproportionately large numbers of poor and less-educated residents. It is hard to recruit companies with good-paying jobs to these areas.

One obvious solution is and always has been education. Theoretically, if a rural county became known for having an extraordinarily well-trained workforce of community college graduates who were fine staying at home, as opposed to going off to UNC or N.C. State and then settling in Cary, that might make a difference. In other words, if you train them and they stay in Duplin County, the biotech companies will come.

But first you’d have to give these rural students a really, really solid foundation from K through 12, and that’s a challenge that has been discussed in Judge Howard Manning’scourtroom for years.

 

November 21, 2013 at 8:38 am
TP Wohlford says:

Dan --

It is my observation that talent / training follows the jobs, NOT the other way around.

In fact, many of the jobs you mention, dare I say it, weren't exactly looking for highly educated work forces. I'm not sure, but I'm betting that a solid background in calculus didn't impress, say, turkey processing plants. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and suggest that, when it came to the furniture trade, the availability of quality hard wood was more important that the ability of locals to recite Shakespeare.

More directly -- I came from Michigan. I watched as our (Dem) Governor (yes, the one that was on TV later), said the same things you said -- that everyone needed a college degree so we would attract jobs. In the midst of those rants, a major drug company pulled every one of its jobs out of Michigan, leaving research PhD'd scientists looking for jobs. IT happens. Heck, unemployed PhD holders are not uncommon now, not to mention thousands of high-tech employees who recently lost their jobs in the Big City.