Obamacare makes takers out of the middle class

Published December 18, 2013

by J. Peder Zane, News and Observer, December 18, 2013.

I might be an Obamacare “winner.” After months of frustration, I might qualify for a policy with better benefits, slightly lower premiums and a smaller deductible. But it comes at a steep price.

The cost of my Obamacare policy cannot be measured in dollars and cents but in dignity. It is transforming me from a contributing member of society into a welfare recipient; its corrosive system of subsidy incentives discourages me from working harder. My familiarity with the law has only bred contempt. Now that I see what’s in it, I don’t just hope but pray that it is overturned, replaced with reforms that actually improve the health care system.

My Obamacare story began in September. I liked my Blue Cross/Blue Shield policy covering the five members of my healthy family. I wasn’t crazy about the $440 monthly premium and $10,000 deductible, but our out-of-pocket expenses were only about $1,200 a year. Because of the tax savings of using a health savings account, we were paying less than when I had employer insurance. We didn’t have “free contraception,” but we made do.

I didn’t realize my plan was “substandard” until I received a letter from BCBS in early October saying that a policy deemed adequate by the president would raise my premium to $1,100 a month and my deductible to $12,400.

After some spirited discussions with the president’s supporters, I went online to see whether I could get a better rate through the federal exchange. The problems with the website are now legend, and I won’t bore you with all the mind-numbing details (unless, of course, you want me to and then I won’t shut up; just ask my wife). I will say that anyone who described those problems as “glitches” was ignorant of the facts and shilling for the administration.

As someone who works on a PC all day, I am used to spinning wheels – but I have never seen them whirl and twirl with such sound and fury as they did on healthcare.gov. The unfailingly polite people at the customer service center – and I talked to lots of them – were using the same system, so they couldn’t help. The phone number I was given for local navigators did not work. The paper application I requested was missing pages needed to add my children.

In early December, BCBS said I could keep my old policy – for $565 a month – but I hadn’t given up on healthcare.gov.

I was finally able to delete my first Obamacare application and fill out a new one over the phone, in about 30 minutes. The system, however, would not allow me to pick a plan, so I had to call back to fix that. Now, with the Dec. 23 deadline looming to ensure no lapse in coverage on Jan. 1, I must send a letter from my employer verifying my salary. I assume hundreds of thousands of others must do the same. I am not confident that each of our applications can be approved, by hand, in a day or two during Christmas.

Let’s pretend everything works out – a big if, given the massive problems insurance companies are having getting reliable information from the federal government. According to the website, I will be paying $452 a month for a policy with a $6,000 deductible and a few favorable co-pay rates. That rate includes a subsidy of $10,140 a year, which far exceeds what I expect to pay in federal income taxes during 2014. Instead of giving money to the government, I am now a taker. This sickens me.

Because my subsidy is based on income, I may think twice about earning more because my effective tax rate on each extra dollar will be about 50 percent. This saddens me.

Without the subsidy, my policy would cost $15,672 a year with a $6,000 deductible (before I was paying $5,280 for a $10,000 deductible). This angers me.

Nancy Pelosi famously said we have to pass the law to know what’s in it. We now know that President Obama told profound lies to sell his program – he should call his next book “The Mendacity of Hope.”

And now we know why he lied. Obamacare replaces a flawed system with one that is far worse. It gouges the affluent and turns the middle-class into wards of the state. This is Obama’s legacy, and it is a tragedy.

 

December 18, 2013 at 10:22 am
Norm Kelly says:

Is it POSSIBLE that an editorial ran in the N&D criticizing the King? What's the chances this is an online-only post? I can't imagine the N&D would put in a newspaper an article critical of ANY Democrat, let alone His High Holiness.

I wonder, though, if the writer was a believer in socialism prior to being forced onto Obamacare. Did the push to socialized medicine help convince the author that socialism is doomed to failure? Or was the author aware all along that socialism, even the 'brand' of socialism supported by Obama/Pelosi/Reid/Hagan, was a bad thing for the majority?

On a much sadder note, I can't imagine that the insurance policy cost virtually tripled from when it was a private pay policy to when it's a 'more affordable' alternative forced upon us by the Demoncrats. What could possibly be worth paying triple to this family? What coverage is this family being forced to carry that does them no good, but costs the rest of us dearly?

So, what part of this stupidity continues to make sense? Is it just socialists that like this government take-over of the health care insurance business? How will all you socialists feel when the solution to this disaster is a complete take-over of the entire medical business? (I used the word 'feel' because I know it's how socialists respond to situations. If I weren't typing at socialists, I would have used the word 'think'.) Of course, you know the response by Pelosi/Reid/Hagan/Price will be that the feds allowed too much private business into the original solution (obamacare), and the only way to 'fix' the law is to remove private business/profit motive from the equation. And the only way to do this is to implement a complete take-over, from manufacturing to care. Then what? Show me where socialized medicine is a success, and the fight against you will stop. Facts are darn funny things. Most politicians try to avoid them. Socialists/DemocRATS ignore them. True conservatives live by them. So come up with some facts, and you get us true conservatives to 'shut up', as it were. I won't be holding my breath waiting.