Pro and con: Should NC Supreme Court OK school vouchers

Published March 15, 2015

by Bill Anderson and Darrell Allison, published in Charlotte Observer, March 14, 2015.

Bill Anderson says no, there’s no way to hold private schools accountable. Darrell Allison says yes, some public schools are failing and we need to give all kids a chance.

Bill Anderson

Dr. Bill Anderson is executive director of MeckEd, a nonprofit that supports strong public schools. Learn more about MeckEd by visiting www.mecked.org.

As the state Supreme Court considers the constitutionality of North Carolina’s new Opportunity Scholarship Program, perhaps this is a good moment to consider the investments taxpayers make to provide a sound basic education for all children.

The Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP) allocates public dollars for vouchers that would allow low-income students to attend private and religious schools. Each child is allocated up to $4,200 per year to put toward private school tuition. The debate about school voucher programs, like the OSP, is emotional and nuanced, with issues of race, poverty, and religion all at play. But let’s set those aside for a moment.

This program raises questions about the transparency, accountability and return taxpayers should expect for investing in education.

Those of us who raise concerns about the OSP do not do so because we oppose school choice. All families should be able to choose the best education for their children. But those choices should be quality ones. Ensuring high-quality education requires transparency and accountability – the same qualities taxpayers demand from traditional public schools.

Superior Court Judge Robert Hobgood raised this point in his opinion to strike down the voucher program last summer. “Appropriating taxpayer funds to unaccountable schools does not accomplish a public purpose,” he wrote, “in violation of North Carolina Constitution Article 5.”

Simply put, private schools are not held to the same standards that we expect from traditional public schools. If we insist on curriculum standards, licensed teachers, and growth in student performance at our public schools, why wouldn’t we expect private schools that receive taxpayer dollars to be held accountable in the same way?

The business community talks a lot about return on investment. The only way to know whether an investment was a wise decision is to evaluate it based on performance. Unfortunately, North Carolina taxpayers will not be able to do that with the Opportunity Scholarship Program.

Judge Hobgood agreed with this point, saying in his opinion that “the expenditure of public funds for private schools without substantive standards to ensure that the promised public good is actually provided cannot be for a public purpose and is unconstitutional.” Under the current voucher program, the public has no way to know if its investment was a good one. That should concern everyone who sends tax dollars to Raleigh.

The fact is, a sound basic education – what the courts say all children in North Carolina are entitled to have – costs more than $4,200 a year. Every state in America spends more than that per student on K-12 education. The national average is more than twice that number. And some of North Carolina’s most elite private schools charge more than five times as much in annual tuition.

Is it possible to receive a sound basic education for $4,200 per child? Will the OSP be a good return on the taxpayers’ investment? Will schools that fail to provide a sound basic education be allowed to continue to operate?

These are all legitimate questions. Unfortunately, the law doesn’t offer us a way to answer them.

Darrell Allison

Darrell Allison is president of Parents for Educational Freedom in North Carolina.

“The bottom line is that the constitutional right belongs to the children. The right does not belong to the adults who are supposed to be ensuring the children of North Carolina obtain a sound basic education in each and every classroom in the state…”

This isn’t a quote from a right-wing conservative conspiring to destroy public schools, but from Judge Howard Manning. Since the Leandro decision 20 years ago, he has been addressing the disparities in education for minority, rural and low-income students through changes in state funding formulas, curriculum, testing, and teaching standards.

Recently Judge Manning concluded: “The academic results of North Carolina’s children enclosed in this Report show that there are way too many thousands of children ... who have not obtained the sound, basic education mandated and defined above and reaffirmed by the North Carolina Supreme Court.”

It is for this reason that we have the Opportunity Scholarship Program: it’s for low-income families whose children desperately need something different. As the Supreme Court weighs the program’s legality, it’s important that we also consider this issue in the court of parent opinion. With nearly 1,200 children in this program, what are parents saying about it?

Lisa Smothers of Wadesboro shares, “My children came home crying over different things happening to them at their district school. As a parent, I want them to develop into intelligent adults. I knew I didn’t want them returning to our failing public school system. This change – this opportunity – has improved their futures.”

Sara Lawson-Smith of Greensboro says, “When I found out that I’d received an Opportunity Scholarship for my son Riley, I cried. My son is now working with teachers who are identifying his individual needs and learning style. He is excelling academically and enjoys school.”

Melody Millsaps of Asheville says, “My boys needed the Opportunity Scholarship because their needs weren’t being met in public school. Teachers in their private school are able to identify their struggles and help them rather than feeling ignored and overlooked.”

In the landmark Leandro decision, the state Supreme Court ruled “every child in the state is guaranteed the right to a ‘sound, basic education’ in our public school.”

Opportunity Scholarship Program opponents will seize on the last four words of this statement, narrowly arguing that public schools only are predestined to educate our children. But what are we truly willing to do when we know poor families and children are not getting that sound, basic education – file another lawsuit when alternatives are offered? Moreover, let’s say the program’s opponents win. What will be their immediate plans to fulfill the constitutional requirement to truly educate these children who Judge Manning stated we’re already failing?

If North Carolina wants to be a leader, then we must focus more on customizing the education of every one of the more than 1.5 million children who attend our public schools.

What about parents like Lisa, Sara, and Melody who don’t live in the right ZIP code or lack the funds to easily pay for a private education? Our state is finally providing these parents real solutions to find that right to a sound, basic education and it would be devastating if our state snatched this opportunity away from them.

March 15, 2015 at 11:45 am
Richard L Bunce says:

Parents hold the school for their child responsible when they control both the attendance of their child and the funding that accompanies their child.

Government education bureaucrats have failed miserably at holding traditional government schools responsible, just look at assessments over the last several decades where the majority of students are not proficient at basic skills. Traditional government schools receive substantial funding not tied to student attendance eliminating incentives to perform their designated task of educating children to the satisfaction of their customers including parents, employers, post secondary education officials. Instead traditional government schools focus on social engineering and showy infrastructure and programs.

How about ALL taxpayer school funding being tied to the student and give all parents a real choice in their child's education whether in a traditional government school or other school of the parent's choice.

March 18, 2015 at 10:06 am
Curt Budd says:

What a noble idea. Wouldn't it be great if every student could go to the BEST school?

And that's the problem. Of course it would be ideal if every student could choose to go to the BEST school. But it's not even close to being practical.

Let's go along with the idea that the money follows the student. You have a district with 5,000 students and 10 schools(public, private, charter, whatever) ranked 1 through 10. All the students want to attend school #1. What is your plan for who gets in? And are you okay with the fact that school #1 prefers only green students with purple hair. All kidding aside, I would like to know, how you would delegate who goes where exactly? In a practical manner. If you can lay it out for me, perhaps I could be moved to your side of the argument. I'm completely serious here. As an educator on the front lines, I want whats best for our future generations. I'm not interested in tired, repeated phrases like "government industrial complex" that quite honestly sounds like its straight off the top of a tea party lobbyist website. IF you truly care, tell me how your plan would work in practical terms.

March 18, 2015 at 3:08 pm
Richard L Bunce says:

Parents would decide what is the best school for their child and the market would respond with the schools that the parents demand. No central planning required. Works just fine for the rest of necessities and niceties of life.

Government EDUCATION industrial complex more concerned with defending traditional school government funding that benefits the government education industrial complex... do you think the defense industrial complex is no a thing as well?

March 19, 2015 at 12:32 pm
Curt Budd says:

Nevermind. Thought you might have a practical way to implement. All your doing is spouting an idealogy. Students and their education are not used cars or corn or whatever. Competition works to a point, but then we are still responsible for educating EVERY child. Sounds very much like current state and national legislatures. They say things that sound great on news sound bites, but have no idea how to actually govern, or put the idealogy into practice.

March 20, 2015 at 11:04 am
Richard L Bunce says:

... and you sir believe the small, insular government education guild is the only entity capable of educating the States children despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/03/why-im-a-public-school-teacher-but-a-private-school-parent/386797/?utm_source=SFFB

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/alabama-victory-school-choice?utm_content=bufferdc9f9&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Let my people go!

March 20, 2015 at 1:46 pm
Curt Budd says:

No sir. I am open to any ideas if it makes the educating of our future generations better. That is why I even take the time to engage in dialogue with you. However, you NEVER offer any practical ways to implement. So its getting old. I still question your motivation. I've given you my background. I'm on the front lines. I care. I don't gain or lose any benefit personally one way or the other. And I promise, because I am a dedicated school teacher, I will never see the inside of a limousine.

As to the articles you list, in the first, the student is attending a SCHOOL with 30 other kids. Of course, they are going to get more individual attention with LIKE-MINDED peers. And if you so choose, thats okay. But you cant use public money, then discriminate. And your still not addressing what you do with everyone else? Just forget about them?

In Alabama, people CHOOSE, to be a part of the system to gain the tax credit, in return for accepting that it might get used for public or private school. Again, if that's your choice, that's fine, but you can't be forced to subsidize tuition where they discriminate. And AGAIN, you're still not addressing the 98% of students that can't get in to that segregated, discriminating, school.

What is your background? Why do you care? What is your motivation? Besides being a Libertarian Lobbyist, do you actually care? Because I do.

March 21, 2015 at 11:48 am
Richard L Bunce says:

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of North Carolina and what those governments do as well as local governments effects me significantly. I care because parents, most low income parents) are being bullied by the government education industrial complex into not having a true choice in their children's education and their children are being harmed. My motivation is to increase personal freedom and liberty for all people so they have real choice and real opportunity. Yes I lobby for libertarian ideas and you lobby for the government education industrial complex...

All parents having a real choice of education for their children is very doable but we have to root out those with interests in maintaining the 20th century education factories aka traditional government schools.

March 22, 2015 at 10:30 am
Peter Cousins says:

I am an educator on the front lines who has worked in both the public and private schools of North Carolina. I can tell you first hand that although there are good teachers and administrators in the public schools, and I would add some very good public schools, the public school system in general is broken and often restrains good teachers from doing what good teachers know needs to happen.

The system is broken because our public schools have taken all accountability away from the students and put it on the teachers. Students are not held accountable for either their behavior or their academics. This creates a culture among the students of "why does it matter, I get promoted anyway". If I fail my EOG I am still promoted, if I curse my teacher out I get a short vacation at home and come right back within three days. Oh ya, and my teachers are told not to give a grade below a 60%, no matter what the student does. How does this prepare anybody? I know that this may not be true at every NC public school, but this is what I experienced and witnessed first hand.

Add to this the fact that most of the teachers I worked with do not feel supported, administrators receive pressure to watch their attendance and promotion rates to look good so nobody ever fails causing the gap between what students actually know and what they should know in a particular grade to expand. And yet many opponents to the Opportunity Scholarship point to the fact that private schools are selective as a bad thing, they are blinded to the fact that their non-selectiveness is part of their systems problem. They have reduced the education, in many low-income schools, to mere babysitting. This clearly is not even close to what the North Carolina constitution requires of public schools.

I admit that this is not the only issue, however I believe that it is at the center. When students are passed on with out mastering the basic concepts we are not serving them as they need. I witnessed 6th grade math students who could not add, divide or do simple multiplication. They failed their EOGs miserably, yet they were passed on to the 7th grade. That would never happen at the private school I currently work at.

Opponents of the Opportunity Scholarship also cry that the private schools will not be held accountable, this is a hypocritical statement of imagination. The fact is they themselves have many schools that are not accountable, oh they are accountable on paper, but the reality is they continue to fail students and they continue to operate while graduating students who can not read or do simple math computations. Why are these schools not shut down? And by the way the public school's system of accountability and certification clearly does not work, so why put that on private schools that are working. I should mention that all of the private schools I have been associated with do have a system of accountability and certification. Some have their own system of certification and accreditation recognized by all 50 states, and others require their teachers to be State certified. I can not imagine operating a successful school any other way, the parents would not stand for it.

Which brings me to the beauty of the Opportunity Scholarship, the accountability is with the parents who will vote with their students which schools are failing and which are not. Many opponents are afraid of this because they will loose control of education, well I say it is about time. When you fail at something year after year, as some NC schools have, it is time for something different. The Public School system should realize that they are the ones who are unconstitutional in that they are not fulfilling their mandate to provide sound education to all North Carolina students. Perhaps the NC Supreme court should wrestle with that.

March 23, 2015 at 11:29 am
Richard L Bunce says:

Ultimately it comes down to this... accountability for a child's education, parents or government education bureaucrats? Unless proven otherwise in a vigorous legal process I side with the parent.

March 23, 2015 at 3:48 pm
Curt Budd says:

If Opportunity Scholarships were being used the way they are marketed and intended, for low-income students to have the opportunity to go to a "better" school that would be wonderful. But THEY ARE NOT. The facts are there. They are being used at schools that segregate, discriminate, or are outright shams for a few private companies to get rich. Let's use charter schools for what they were first intended, places for new, innovative practices or systems to be developed that could then be passed on to traditional schools.

And let's find the right people that could actually make some positive, lasting changes to the things with the public system that can be better.

Public schools can work. I'm biased, but I would put the public high school I work at, against ANY school public, private, charter, whatever in the state. If it works here, it should be able to work other places.

And finally, we need to quit trying to use 1950's segregated ideas, to address education in a society that has become multi-cultural, often single-parent in nature. We are not going to wake up tomorrow and everything look like the "Leave it to Beaver" show, so you better learn to deal with society in its current form.

We all want the same thing, the best education possible for future generations, I just don't see how you get around the discriminating issue, or the issue of charter or private schools being able to hide where the money is going.

March 23, 2015 at 11:53 pm
Richard L Bunce says:

So the parents of these children are fools then... that is your position?

March 24, 2015 at 9:35 am
Curt Budd says:

No sir. I wish MORE parents would get involved in their child's education. But the position that you are taking, using public money to support schools that segregate and discriminate is morally and ethically wrong.

March 25, 2015 at 11:04 am
Richard L Bunce says:

You wish more parents would shut up and blindly support the ever increasing traditional government school funding even in the face of the continuing failure of traditional government schools to adequately educate their children. Attach the funding to the child and let the parents decide which education system is best for their child. If as you claim your school is fantastic and all parents agree you have nothing to worry about. Traditional government schools are largely segregated and discriminate when parents physically move to a different school district... unless you want to restrict where families can live too?