Time to kill the death penalty

Published May 1, 2015

Editorial by Durham Herald-Sun, April 30, 2015.

You may remember the case of Henry Lee McCollum.

McCollum was on North Carolina’s death row for 30 years. All the while, the state of North Carolina was poised to put McCollum to death – for a crime, it turned out, he did not commit.

To hear State House Speaker Tim Moore Wednesday night, McCollum should have long since been dead.

“Because of the pure bureaucracy, they simply continue to stay in prison,” Moore said as the House debated passage of several changes designed to restart executions, stalled in this state since 2006. “When a court hands down a decision, particularly one in the matter of life and death, that decision ought to be carried out.”

The juxtaposition of last fall’s decision by a Robeson County Superior Court judge to free McCollum and the eagerness by Moore and others to jump-start executions underscores the vindictive folly of the death penalty in the 21st century.

McCollum and fellow defendant Leon Brown, who was serving a life sentence, were convicted in a shabby prosecution more interested in a swift verdict than justice. The court last fall accepted DNA evidence that exonerated the pair and implicated another man.

The bill Moore was endorsing passed the House 84-33 Wednesday, narrowly beating the crossover deadline for bills to pass one chamber. It now goes to the Senate.

In a zealous effort to remove any obstacles to the death penalty, it brushes away practical and ethical roadblocks. Since doctors now refuse to participate in state-sanctioned killing – which does seem to contravene the Hippocratic Oath – the bill would allow other medical professionals to oversee executions. Because botched lethal injections have given a rise to a chorus of objections to that method, the bill would keep the name of the manufacturer of the killing drugs secret – as well as the exact combination of drugs in the execution cocktail.

Rep. Rick Glazier, a Fayetteville Democrat, noted the irony of considering the bill on the day the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in an Oklahoma case challenging that state’s injections.

“It is stunning and ironic we are doing this tonight," Glazier said, "We ought to at least be transparent about the method used to execute people."

Rep. Graig Meyer, a Hillsborough Democrat, briefly tried to broaden the debate to consider eliminating the death penalty, but concluded the time was not right.

It should be. The Senate should reject this bill, and the General Assembly should realize the arc of history is moving against the death penalty, an irreversible outcome of an imperfect process.

http://www.heraldsun.com/opinion/editorials/x219725443/Time-to-kill-the-death-penalty

May 1, 2015 at 10:38 am
Johnny Hiott says:

"An imperfect process" That is exactly what North Carolina has in a court/justice system. That is the root of the problem. Judges, lawyers, district attorneys and law enforcement are allowed to say virtually anything they choose, true or not. So it is the same with defense attorneys. Why not have a re-awakening of justice in our courts by first swearing in ALL officials in the courts at the beginning of any trial ? Justice would be served and the percentage of innocent found guilty would drop drastically. If the lying were banned in courts the innocent would not be convicted to begin with. It is not the death penalty that is wrong it is the conniving district attorneys who could care less about the accused innocence but in their conviction rates. Until the focus returns to justice it will remain wrong no matter what the sentence.