Why North Carolina should get away from Common Core

Published April 13, 2014

by Dan Forest, Lt. Governor of NC, published in Greensboro News-Record, April 13, 2014.

North Carolina should have the highest education standards in the world, but we can do better than Common Core.

Four years after Common Core was adopted by the State Board of Education, many students, parents and educators are getting their first glimpse of the implications of the new standards in the classroom. Yet after months of questions about the challenges of the standards from parents and educators, few answers have been revealed. Here is why we can to better than Common Core:

1. Local control of education is a bedrock of our nation. Parents, teachers and school boards should have ultimate control and authority over the education of their children. Common Core is a copyrighted set of standards, designed by two unaccountable national trade associations and pushed by the federal government through Race To The Top grants ($400 million in North Carolina) for states that adopted the standards. These standards cannot be changed or modified by state or local authorities. The argument is that we can add to them; however, the reality is that we cannot change anything written in them. Common Core is inflexible in meeting the demands of rapid change that is occurring around the world.

2. A One-Size-Fits-All set of standards for all of education in America is un-American. America is a nation of diversity and innovation. Each student is unique, and for the first time in the history of the world, through high-speed broadband technology and one-to-one devices in the hands of every student, we have the opportunity to customize curriculum and the education experience to each and every child. Our 50 states should be recognized for the innovation laboratories that they are, and they should be allowed to innovate in education, constantly improving standards and teaching methodologies in order to share their ideas with other states. A one-size-fits-all set of standards restricts that level of innovation.

3. Why would we settle for anything less than the best standards for North Carolina? Massachusetts had the best math standards in America, so why did we not start by adopting its standards for our students? Massachusetts educators improved their standards over decades, and they had been tried, tested, rewritten and aligned with working assessments. The Common Core standards still have not been tried, tested or rewritten for success four years after adoption in North Carolina. Why would we roll out Common Core to every school and every student in our state, all at once, without proper vetting and testing?

4. Common Core does not prepare our students for STEM education or careers.The promise of Common Core was that it was to be rigorous, internationally benchmarked, and it would prepare our students for college and career. Unfortunately, experts admit that rigor is difficult to define; the standards were never internationally benchmarked, and there is much debate as to Common Core college alignment. Experts have noted that the Common Core math sequence does not prepare our students for a rigorous STEM education in the university, nor does it prepare our students for STEM careers.

Why would the Chamber of Commerce, the conservative Fordham Institute, the Gates Foundation and others support Common Core despite its inability to prepare our students for STEM careers? Because there are significant financial interests for each. Experts have also noted that replacing classic literature with informational text, such as Consumer Reports, does not help our students develop better critical-thinking skills or reading skills.

5. Teachers need to be free to teach. Common Core is just another set of bureaucratic mandates that will force teachers to teach to the test. There has been much frustration from the teaching community regarding this aspect of No Child Left Behind, so the federal government created waivers from NCLB only to replace it with more burdensome guidelines that will take creativity and innovation out of the classroom. If we want innovation in education, we should focus less on standards and more on allowing our teachers to do what they do best — teach.

These are just a few reasons why Common Core should be replaced in North Carolina, not mentioning the high cost of implementation at a time when we need to increase teacher pay. Nor did I mention technology readiness for the standards, or even data collection of student information. It is time to replace Common Core with the best standards in the world — North Carolina standards.

I recently recommended to the General Assembly a standards and assessments review commission to take on this task in North Carolina.

http://www.news-record.com/opinion/columns/article_ef0badac-c0f0-11e3-b83a-001a4bcf6878.html

April 13, 2014 at 9:37 pm
Richard Bunce says:

Parents need good assessments of their children's school. The biggest mistake over the last several decades is using the persons being assessed, the government school education bureaucrats, administrators/teachers to conduct the assessment. They will screw up any testing system including teaching to the test and outright cheating.

April 14, 2014 at 8:07 pm
Sancho Panza says:

I teach in NC. I have students in the public schools. Common Core is a monstrous disaster. When will some one have the guts to kick the progressives out of education. Brainless PHDs coming up with new method after new method, each less effective than the last. Education was around long before modern progressives. The greatest men in history were mostly self taught. How often do you ever hear anyone say "I owe it all to public education." Teach the children facts and great things. Teach them about great men. Leave the teachers to do their jobs. I am happy that Dan Forest has the guts to go as far as he has.

April 15, 2014 at 11:13 am
Richard Bunce says:

Mr. Panza.

1. So should school system performance be assessed and if so how do you think the assessment should be done?

I think the assessment of the school system should be done be an organization totally independent of the school system by inquiring of the systems students knowledge of basic skills. This should be done toward the end of the students longest break of the year by a sample of selected students to ensure significant statistical results and should focus on one on one discussions and short writing tasks with trained assessors. The assessment oversight team should include parents, employers, university/college professors but not from education departments. After the assessment results are in then representatives of the schools systems and university/college education departments should be assembled to review the assessment and decide upon corrective actions for the school system.

2. Should all parents be able to send their children to the school system of their choice?

This fundamentally comes down to making government education dollars available to relatively low income parents so that they have at least closer to the same opportunities that relatively higher income parents currently have for their children.

I believe we are getting to the point where interested parents and employers need to come together to consider creating a new education system to meet their needs.