Is k-12 budget up or down?

Published December 5, 2013

by Paige Worsham and Mebane Rash, NC Public Policy Center, published in Charlotte Observer, December 4, 2013.

This summer, Republican Gov. Pat McCrory said at an N.C. Chamber summit, “at $7.8 billion, this is the largest K-12 budget in North Carolina’s history.” The line item appropriation for the Department of Public Instruction enacted by the legislature in its 2013-14 budget is $7,867,960,649. The governor didn’t even round up.

In our analysis of budget numbers, the Center uses the General Fund’s enacted budget appropriations. These numbers are reported each year by the Fiscal Research Division in the N.C. General Assembly during the budget process, and they are available for the public to view online. Subsequent legislation can change the numbers, and the difficulty involved in tracking down those modifications adds to the confusion surrounding final figures. For example, the 2013-14 line item appropriation to DPI was changed to $7,865,960,649 by a law that moved the Education and Workforce Innovation Commission and $2 million from DPI to the Office of the Governor.

The pivotal comparison year in the argument over whether education funding is up or down is 2008-09, before the recession and when Democrats were in power. In that year, there was an appropriation to DPI of $7,802,046,538 – $63,914,111 less than in 2013-14. That comparison supports Gov. McCrory’s contention that more money was appropriated this year for K-12 spending than ever before.

Some argue those numbers should be adjusted for inflation. Others note that the average per pupil expenditure (PPE) has decreased from $8,712.00 in 2008-09 to $8,514.21 in 2012-13. But the PPE varies widely among counties from a high of $17,556.59 in Hyde County to a low of $7,373.68 in Davidson County. And the state pays 63.4 percent of the total PPE – among the highest in the nation.

None tells the whole story

The only thing that is clear is that none of these figures tell the whole story. The discussion over funding, especially education funding, has become extremely political because people choose numbers based on which ones support their respective conclusions.

In the appendix to Gov. McCrory’s 2013-2015 Recommended Budget, a table presents the General Fund operating appropriations for public schools, community colleges and higher education back to 1981-82. This table indicates the 2008-09 appropriation to public schools was $7.9 billion. Why is this figure higher than the enacted budget appropriation found in the Joint Committee Conference Report? Because the higher figure – $7,993,668,839 – includes reserves for pay raises that year.

This is not the first time people in this state have disagreed about which budget numbers offer the most appropriate or best comparisons. In 2011-12, many decried a $1 billion cut in education spending. This included spending for community colleges, the K-12 system and the university system. The complaint was based on a comparison between the continuation budget of $11,913,511,629 and the enacted appropriation for 2011-12 of $10,989,867,189. However, that second number was $182,207,110 higher than the enacted appropriation for 2010-11. Getting complicated? Wait, there’s more.

Until now, there has been no statutory definition for the continuation budget so the formula varied. The common concept of a continuation budget is the amount of money it would take to offer the current level of government services in the next year. But North Carolina is a growing state. What if you know more kids are going to show up to attend public schools in August? Do you include it? The 2011-13 budget did not include enrollment projections for public schools and universities, but the 2013-15 budget did.

This year, the legislature enacted a statutory definition of continuation budget to make clear what will and will not be included going forward. This definition will allow the public to compare year-to-year the continuation budget numbers.

Different ways to compare

Which budget numbers to compare year-to-year is a perennial debate. The enacted budget is available as soon as the legislature passes it and the governor signs it. It is possible for the public make their own comparisons of the budget documents. However, these numbers do not include statewide reserve distributions (such as retirement and health benefits), which are allocated by the Office of State Budget and Management in October/November, and other internal agency changes. Another possible point of comparison occurs after those reserves are distributed. And yet another possible point of comparison is when the certified budget is issued reporting actual dollars spent, but that is not available until the end of the fiscal year.

No one is going to win this debate any time soon. In the meantime, the public deserves to be informed which numbers are being used in the comparisons.

The numbers used and the comparisons made frame the discussion for the public in important ways politically. However, the more important policy discussion is how the money should be spent. All citizens should weigh in on that debate – Republicans, Democrats, and Independents.

Mebane Rash and Paige Worsham are attorneys with the nonpartisan N.C. Center for Public Policy Research.

December 5, 2013 at 9:04 am
TP Wohlford says:

Perhaps the N.C. Center for Public Policy Research can provide a number, a singular number, for how much is "enough". Enough that we, the tax payers, are absolved of guilt for any failings. Enough that educators no longer have a money excuse for any failings. Enough that all buildings are clean and properly maintained, and all buses run every day. Enough that teachers are paid according to some sort of fair market value, where the good ones are kept.

Enough with the rhetoric -- give us a NUMBER.

December 5, 2013 at 9:05 am
Richard Bunce says:

Spending money on some goal is not the same as accomplishing that goal and the State education budget is a perfect example. The State spends billions every year with additional Federal and Local government spending added to that yet less than half of government school students are proficient at the fundamental skills such as reading and math.