Legislature Keeps On Rolling Back Bad Laws

Published July 12, 2013

By Becki Gray

By Becki Gray, Carolina Journal and NC SPIN panelist, July 9, 2013.

News flash from the Left: The new legislative leadership is rolling back years of laws made under the old leadership.

This is a surprise? Were these folks not paying attention during the election when conservatives promised smaller government with lower taxes, more accountability and transparency, fewer regulations, and less bureaucracy? Think free market, competition, and personal responsibility. Elections have consequences, and new leadership brings new ideas.

There’s a different management team in charge of state government for the first time in more than a century. Our friends on the Left assert that things have been hunky-dory across North Carolina — that the size of government is just right, we’re spending just the right amount of money, that the tax system is fair enough, that an 80 percent graduation rate is good enough, and that layers and layers of bureaucracy are an efficient way to manage state government.

Well, sorry friends. Things are broken in North Carolina, and the fix-it gang has been called in.

The past growth of state government has outpaced the growth of population and inflation and is unsustainable. Years of new programs, higher taxes, regulations, and more and more government have made us less competitive, slowed growth, and stymied economic recovery.

A new path includes a budget that provides for core functions of government with no new taxes, no new debt, no new programs, and replenishing the state’s savings accounts. Allowing hard-working families to keep more of their money incentivizes investment and entrepreneurship. A robust economy and job creation will happen with less government, not more.

Oppressive debt is being addressed by scaling back unemployment benefits from being the most generous in the Southeast to comparable with our neighbors so we can pay back a $2.4 billion debt to the federal government and get our own fiscal house in order.

When something works, you keep it. When studies say it doesn’t work, dump it and find what does work. Studies show pre-K programs work for economically disadvantaged children. Rather than fund them for all children, let’s put our money where we know it works.

Same with reading assistants — they work in kindergarten and first grade; let’s put the money there and use the rest in other areas we know will get results. Just because we’ve “always” had teacher assistants in other grades doesn’t mean that’s the best use of resources.

Our tax system is outdated, unnecessarily complicated, and a drag on our economy. Reforms would flatten the personal income tax and lower the rate below that of our neighbors, eliminate or reduce the corporate income tax, and expand the sales tax. The General Assembly’s nonpartisan fiscal research staff tells us that just about every taxpayer in North Carolina would pay less, and a dozen or so economic studies tell us these reforms would stimulate our economy, creating jobs and long-term benefits.

Medicaid is 15 percent of our state budget and is the fastest-growing segment. Recent audits reveal hundreds of millions of dollars have been wasted or misspent. Cost containment has not been a priority, and oversight has been lacking. Care is expensive with low patient outcomes.

Badly in need of reform, changes to Medicaid would empower recipients to make health care decisions that fit their needs, lead to healthier lives, and save taxpayers money.

Nonprofits with publicly funded slush funds run by political operatives have to go. The N.C. Biotechnology Center was set up in 1984, The Rural Economic Development Center in 1986, the N.C. Natural Heritage Trust Fund in 1987, the Clean Water Management Trust Fund in 1996, the Golden LEAF foundation in 1999, and the Biofuels Center in 2007. They have funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to state agencies, local governments, and individuals with little transparency or accountability.

If these groups are funding legitimate uses of taxpayer money that deliver value to the public, let’s make their actions open and transparent.

The Racial Justice Act was enacted in 2009 to use statistical data to impose a de facto moratorium on the death penalty. The death penalty in North Carolina is constitutional. If North Carolinians want to repeal the death penalty, it deserves an honest debate. Now we can have it.

For 50 years, North Carolina municipalities were allowed to annex property against the owners’ will, forcing them to pay higher taxes for services they may not have wanted or needed. And those citizens had no say so in the matter.

Under the new leadership, those unfair forced annexation laws were rolled back, ensuring that property rights in North Carolina are safe and respected.

Our friends on the Left are correct. The new leadership in Raleigh is rolling back many of the old laws — years of big government and big taxing decisions. And I, for one, say keep on rolling.

July 12, 2013 at 5:27 pm
Talmadge Walker says:

Good honest journalists display their affiliations. Why is Becki Gray of the John Locke Foundation hiding hers?

July 12, 2013 at 10:55 pm
NC SPIN says:

Talmadge the fault is not Becki's but ours. We identify her on the show as an editor of Carolina Journal (which she is) and NC SPIN panelist. We wrote the ID, not Becki.

July 12, 2013 at 5:28 pm
Jason A. Thomas says:

Who knows what is best for you? You do.

The NC legislature needs to become less oppressive not only to economic decisions but to personal decisions also. Blue laws in alcohol, hunting, and marriage all inhibit personal choice and control.

I used to be a Republican until I moved out west to Idaho. I am now a libertarian. I went to law school at U of Idaho and I saw a new Republican party out west. It is a party that legislates fewer rules and laws, and lets people make their own decisions. I have become disillusioned with the National Republican party and to an extent the NC state party. Down here, the state government allows you choice as long as it coincides with their set of values.

The state is taking the right road to individual choice in some circumstances and the wrong road in others.

There is a bill lifting restrictions on hunting on Sundays on private land; it should go to public lands also, but it is a right step. I will be working throughout the week and because of this law, hunting cannot be a choice I can make on Sunday unless I have access to land? I make the choice myself and I would not harm anybody more on Sunday than I would on any other day. Why can I not hunt on Sunday? Other people should not try and make this choice for me.

A legislator is now trying to put a TWO YEAR waiting period on divorce! This is overly oppressive. In Idaho where I worked as a legal intern as I got my law degree, there was only a 6 week waiting period and then one can file for a no-fault divorce. It takes a long time for the divorce if child support and custody is to be litigated without a waiting period. With a two year waiting period plus a year for litigation, it could take three years. I got my law degree in three years. If I married my first year, it would take longer to get divorced than to get my law degree. If we have a fundamental right to privacy in our marital relationships, what compelling reason does the state have to interfere with the dissolution of the marriage?

Out east, with the exception of New Hampshire, the state governments still have many bad laws on the books that prohibit personal choice and freedom. This article, and many times the government, only focuses on economic issues. The state government should also fight to repel bad laws that repeal oppression to choice. I feel that coming back east was a mistake, and seeing the difference, I plan on moving back out west to allow myself more personal choice.

July 12, 2013 at 5:31 pm
Jason A. Thomas says:

Correction: 6 week residency requirement. no waiting period.

July 12, 2013 at 5:38 pm
dj anderson says:

Whoa! That was not a defense, but an offense. How unusual, but will this charge make headlines?

Well said, but please give me the argument for not extending Medicare under the ACA. Medicaid was addressed in this blog and yes it has been mismanaged, and I'm not arguing with that. Show the public a program that works right, and they will give it another dollar, but show them one that wastes dollars and they won't give you another penny. Still, could we not repair Medicaid and still take on more cases? Why not?

July 12, 2013 at 11:13 pm
Talmadge Walker says:

Sorry for being snappy but it's a pretty big oversight on your part then. She in effect works for McCory's Budget Director. Your readers need to know that.